Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31294917›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2019

A cardiovascular risk prediction model for older people: Development and validation in a primary care population.

Emma F van Bussel, Edo Richard, Wim B Busschers, Ewout W Steyerberg, Willem A van Gool, Eric P Moll van Charante, Marieke P Hoevenaar-Blom

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Cardiovascular Risk Prediction in Older Adults.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Prediction of cardiovascular events from systolic or diastolic blood pressure.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emma F van BusselDepartment of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4958-0902
Edo RichardDepartment of Neurology, Donderds Centre for Brain, Behaviour and Cognition, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Wim B BusschersDepartment of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ewout W SteyerbergDepartment of Biomedical Data Sciences, LUMC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Willem A van GoolDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eric P Moll van CharanteDepartment of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marieke P Hoevenaar-BlomDepartment of Neurology, Donderds Centre for Brain, Behaviour and Cognition, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLErasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular risk prediction is mainly based on traditional risk factors that have been validated in middle-aged populations. However, associations between these risk factors and cardiovascular disease (CVD) attenuate with increasing age. Therefore, for older people the authors developed and internally validated risk prediction models for fatal and non-fatal CVD, (re)evaluated the predictive value of traditional and new factors, and assessed the impact of competing risks of non-cardiovascular death. Post hoc analyses of 1811 persons aged 70-78 year and free from CVD at baseline from the preDIVA study (Prevention of Dementia by Intensive Vascular care, 2006-2015), a primary care-based trial that included persons free from dementia and conditions likely to hinder successful long-term follow-up, were performed. In 2017-2018, Cox-regression analyses were performed for a model including seven traditional risk factors only, and a model to assess incremental predictive ability of the traditional and eleven new factors. Analyses were repeated accounting for competing risk of death, using Fine-Gray models. During an average of 6.2 years of follow-up, 277 CVD events occurred. Age, sex, smoking, and type 2 diabetes mellitus were traditional predictors for CVD, whereas total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, and systolic blood pressure (SBP) were not. Of the eleven new factors, polypharmacy and apathy symptoms were predictors. Discrimination was moderate (concordance statistic 0.65). Accounting for competing risks resulted in slightly smaller predicted absolute risks. In conclusion, we found, SBP, HDL, and total cholesterol no longer predict CVD in older adults, whereas polypharmacy and apathy symptoms are two new relevant predictors. Building on the selected risk factors in this study may improve CVD prediction in older adults and facilitate targeting preventive interventions to those at high risk.

Indexed as

AgedApathyApolipoproteins EBlood PressureCardiovascular DiseasesCase-Control StudiesCholesterol, HDLDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsOutcome Assessment, Health CarePeptide FragmentsPolypharmacyapolipoprotein E (133-149)Apolipoproteins ECholesterol, HDLPeptide Fragmentscardiovascular diseasecompeting risk of deatholder peoplepredictionprimary prevention

Identifiers

PMID31294917
PMCPMC6772108
OpenAlexW2959156170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.