Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31294893›Full record

ArticleCancer science2019

Accurate expression of PD-L1/L2 in lung adenocarcinoma cells: A retrospective study by double immunohistochemistry.

Yusuke Shinchi, Yoshihiro Komohara, Kimihiro Yonemitsu, Kensaku Sato, Koji Ohnishi, Yoichi Saito, Yukio Fujiwara, Takeshi Mori, Kenji Shiraishi, Koei Ikeda and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yusuke ShinchiDepartment of Cell Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Yoshihiro KomoharaDepartment of Cell Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9723-0846
Kimihiro YonemitsuDepartment of Cell Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Kensaku SatoDepartment of Cell Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Koji OhnishiDepartment of Cell Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Yoichi SaitoDepartment of Cell Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Yukio FujiwaraDepartment of Cell Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Takeshi MoriDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Kenji ShiraishiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Koei IkedaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Makoto SuzukiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 16H05162Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 16K15503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The percentage of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) positivity in cancer cells, named as the tumor proportion score, is considered to be a predictive biomarker for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in lung cancer. PD-L1 is expressed on not only cancer cells but also on immune cells, including macrophages. Although previous studies related to PD-L1/2 expression in cancer tissues have been generally based on single immunohistochemistry (IHC), in the present study, we attempted to evaluate accurate PD-L1/2 expression in cancer cells in lung adenocarcinoma cells using double IHC to also evaluate macrophages. Of the 231 patients, PD-L1 expression was negative in 169 patients (73.2%), 1%-49% positive in 47 patients (20.3%), and ≥50% positive in 15 patients (6.5%). Interestingly, PD-L1 positivity was decreased when using double IHC compared with the estimation by single IHC. High PD-L1 expression was associated with high-grade cancer cells and in higher stage cancer. PD-L2 was negative in 109 patients (47.2%), 1%-49% positive in 50 patients (21.6%), and ≥50% positive in 72 patients (31.2%). The number of PD-L2-positive patients was increased in cases that had an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and in lower stage cancer. Thirty-five patients (15.2%) were positive for both PD-L1 and PD-L2, whereas 81 patients (35.1%) were negative for both PD-L1 and PD-L2. Log-rank analysis showed that progression-free survival and overall survival were significantly the longest in the PD-L1-negative and PD-L2-positive groups (P < .0001 and P = .0120). We observed lower PD-L1 or PD-L2 expression in lung adenocarcinoma than previously reported. Double IHC for macrophages may help clinicians to evaluate PD-L1 or PD-L2 expression specifically in cancer cells.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of LungAgedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryLungLung NeoplasmsMacrophagesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorCD274 protein, humanPDCD1LG2 protein, humanPDCD1 protein, humanProgrammed Cell Death 1 Ligand 2 ProteinProgrammed Cell Death 1 Receptorlung adenocarcinomamacrophagePD-L1PD-L2tumor proportion score

Identifiers

PMID31294893
PMCPMC6726681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.