Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31294691›Full record

ArticleeLife2019

MagC, magnetic collection of ultrathin sections for volumetric correlative light and electron microscopy.

Thomas Templier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. RAEM: random-access electron microscopy for revisitable 3D imaging.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Photoemission electron microscopy for connectomics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Morphomics via next-generation electron microscopy.Journal of molecular cell biology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Array tomography: trails to discovery.Methods in microscopy · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Volume electron microscopy.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Thomas TemplierInstitute of Neuroinformatics, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0523-5947

Funding

ETH Zürich Foundation ETH Grant 42 15-1ETH Zurich Foundation ETH Grant 42 15-1Innosuisse Bridge Proof of Concept 173825Innosuisse-Swiss National Foundation Bridge Proof of Concept 173825Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung Bridge Proof of Concept 173825
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The non-destructive collection of ultrathin sections on silicon wafers for post-embedding staining and volumetric correlative light and electron microscopy traditionally requires exquisite manual skills and is tedious and unreliable. In MagC introduced here, sample blocks are augmented with a magnetic resin enabling the remote actuation and collection of hundreds of sections on wafer. MagC allowed the correlative visualization of neuroanatomical tracers within their ultrastructural volumetric electron microscopy context.

Indexed as

Histocytological Preparation TechniquesMagneticsMicroscopyMicroscopy, Electronconnectomicscorrelative light and electron microscopyneuroscienceultramicrotomyZebra Finch

Identifiers

PMID31294691
PMCPMC6697447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.