Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31294589›Full record

Trial reportJournal of consulting and clinical psychology2019

Intensive group behavioral treatment (IGBT) for children with selective mutism: A preliminary randomized clinical trial.

Danielle Cornacchio, Jami M Furr, Amanda L Sanchez, Natalie Hong, Leah K Feinberg, Rachel Tenenbaum, Cristina Del Busto, Laura J Bry, Bridget Poznanski, Elizabeth Miguel and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Understanding Selective Mutism in Very Young Children.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Remote Intensive Group Behavioral Treatment for Families of Children with Selective Mutism.Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Danielle CornacchioCenter for Children and Families, Mental Health Interventions and Technology (MINT) Program, Department of Psychology, Florida International University.
Jami M FurrCenter for Children and Families, Mental Health Interventions and Technology (MINT) Program, Department of Psychology, Florida International University.
Amanda L SanchezCenter for Children and Families, Mental Health Interventions and Technology (MINT) Program, Department of Psychology, Florida International University.
Natalie HongCenter for Children and Families, Mental Health Interventions and Technology (MINT) Program, Department of Psychology, Florida International University.
Leah K FeinbergCenter for Children and Families, Mental Health Interventions and Technology (MINT) Program, Department of Psychology, Florida International University.
Rachel TenenbaumCenter for Children and Families, Mental Health Interventions and Technology (MINT) Program, Department of Psychology, Florida International University.
Cristina Del BustoCenter for Children and Families, Mental Health Interventions and Technology (MINT) Program, Department of Psychology, Florida International University.
Laura J BryCenter for Children and Families, Mental Health Interventions and Technology (MINT) Program, Department of Psychology, Florida International University.
Bridget PoznanskiCenter for Children and Families, Mental Health Interventions and Technology (MINT) Program, Department of Psychology, Florida International University.
Elizabeth MiguelCenter for Children and Families, Mental Health Interventions and Technology (MINT) Program, Department of Psychology, Florida International University.
Thomas H OllendickDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Tech.
Steven M S KurtzPrivate Practice.
Jonathan S ComerCenter for Children and Families, Mental Health Interventions and Technology (MINT) Program, Department of Psychology, Florida International University.
Florida Department of Children and Families · USIS practice · BEVirginia Tech · US

Funding

Evaluating Innovative Treatment Formats for Difficult-to-Treat Child PopulationsF31MH112296 · NIMH · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI CORNACCHIO, DANIELLE · 2017 to 2017
$35k
American Psychological Association Division 53; Society for Clinical Child and Adolescent PsychologyNational Institutes of HealthNIMH NIH HHS F31 MH112296
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveVery few controlled trials have evaluated targeted treatment methods for childhood selective mutism (SM); the availability of evidence-based services remains limited. This study is the first controlled trial to evaluate an intensive group behavioral treatment (IGBT) for children with SM.

methodTwenty-nine children with SM (5-9 years; 76% female; 35% ethnic minority) were randomized to immediate SM 5-day IGBT or to a 4-week waitlist with psychoeducational resources (WLP), and were assessed at Week 4 and again 8 weeks into the following school year.

resultsIGBT was associated with high satisfaction and low perceived barriers to treatment participation. At Week 4, 50% of the immediate IGBT condition and 0% of the WLP condition were classified as "clinical responders." Further, Time × Condition interactions were significant for social anxiety severity, verbal behavior in social situations, and global functioning (but not for SM severity, verbal behavior in home settings, or overall anxiety). School-year follow-up assessments revealed significant improvements across all outcomes. Eight weeks into the following school year, 46% of IGBT-treated children were free of an SM diagnosis. In addition, teachers in the post-IGBT school year rated less school impairment and more classroom verbal behavior relative to teachers in the pre-IGBT school year.

conclusionsFindings provide the first empirical support for the efficacy and acceptability of IGBT for SM. Further study is needed to examine mechanisms of IGBT response, and other effective SM treatment methods, in order to clarify which treatment formats work best for which affected children. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyChildChild, PreschoolEthnicityFemaleHumansMaleMinority GroupsMutismPsychotherapy, GroupTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID31294589
PMCPMC6629469
OpenAlexW2962537286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.