ArticleCancer medicine2019
Two activating mutations of MPL in triple-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single nucleotide polymorphism and promoter methylation analysis of protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Clinical laboratory characteristics and gene mutation spectrum of Ph-negative MPN patients with atypical variants of JAK2, MPL, or CALR.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Philadelphia-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Clinical and Laboratory Features of JAK2 V617F, CALR, and MPL Mutations in Malaysian Patients with Classical Myeloproliferative Neoplasm (MPN).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Thrombocytosis in children and adolescents-classification, diagnostic approach, and clinical management.Annals of hematology · 2021Review
- Review
- A Rare Case of Essential Thrombocythemia with CoexistingJournal of Korean medical science · 2020Article
- Two activating mutations of MPL in triple-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms.Cancer medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
MPLW515K or W515L mutation plays an important role in the pathogenesis of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) through signaling molecules of the cytokine receptor axis. Besides MPLW515K or W515L, more than 30 atypical MPL mutations have been reported in patients who are negative for JAK2V617F, MPLW515K/L, and CALR mutations. Here, we aimed to identify the disease-causing mutations in the triple-negative case of ET. We described two MPL mutations in patients diagnosed with ET by target sequencing the hotspot mutation region of MPL gene. The MPLA497-L498ins4 is an insertion mutation detected recurrently in ET patients, and the MPLW515RQ516E is a novel double-point mutation found in an ET patient. Functional studies of MPLA497-L498ins4 and MPLW515RQ516E revealed that they are gain-of-function mutations. Mutants of MPLA497-L498ins4 and MPLW515RQ516E promoted autonomous proliferation on Ba/F3 cells in the absence of IL-3. Autonomous activation of TPO-R without ligand TPO was observed in MPLA497-L498ins4 and MPLW515RQ516E mutants. Lower percentage of cells in G1 phase and higher percentage of cells in S phase of two atypical MPL mutants were detected after culturing without any cytokines. These two atypical MPL mutations also presented increase in phosphorylation of signaling proteins including JAK2/STAT, PI3K/AKT, and MAPK/RAS. In summary, the MPLA497-L498ins4 and MPLW515RQ516E are gain-of-function mutations which may be novel driving factors participating in the pathogenesis of triple-negative MPN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.