Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31294225›Full record

ReviewAIMS microbiology2018

Joseph O Falkinham

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AIMS microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Critical reviews in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. TheMicroorganisms · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Heterogeneity amongMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Growth in biofilms preparesFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  8. The effects of silver nitrate onFrontiers in public health · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Biofilm prevention concentration of clarithromycin against clinically relevant species of nontuberculous mycobacteria.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Biofilm Development byAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joseph O FalkinhamDepartment of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA.
Virginia Tech · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

adherenceantibioticbiofilmdisinfectanthydrophobicMACM. avium complexmethylobacteriamycobacteria

Identifiers

PMID31294225
PMCPMC6604937
OpenAlexW2808259840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.