Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31294134›Full record

Trial reportInvestigative and clinical urology2019

Efficacy of pethidine, ketorolac, and lidocaine gel as analgesics for pain control in shockwave lithotripsy: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial.

Abdelwahab Hashem, Fady K Ghobrial, M A Elbaset, Ahmed M Atwa, Mohamed Fadallah, Mahmoud Laymon, Ahmed El-Assmy, Khaled Z Sheir, Hassan Abol-Enein

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Investigative and clinical urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Abdelwahab HashemDepartment of Urology, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-0664-3504
Fady K GhobrialDepartment of Urology, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
M A ElbasetDepartment of Urology, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Ahmed M AtwaDepartment of Urology, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Mohamed FadallahDepartment of Urology, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Mahmoud LaymonDepartment of Urology, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Ahmed El-AssmyDepartment of Urology, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Khaled Z SheirDepartment of Urology, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Hassan Abol-EneinDepartment of Urology, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Mansoura University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the safety and efficacy of xylocaine gel and ketorolac as opioid-sparing analgesia compared with pethidine for shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) pain. Materials and Methods: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) was performed in 132 patients with renal and upper ureteral stones amenable to treatment with SWL. The first patient group received intravenous (IV) pethidine and placebo gel; the second group received IV ketorolac plus placebo gel; the third group received lidocaine gel locally plus normal saline IV. Stone disintegration was classified as none (no change from basal by kidney, ureter, bladder X-ray or ultrasound [US] imaging), partial (fragmented and >4-mm residual fragments), and complete (≤4-mm residual fragments). Stone disintegration was assessed by kidney-ureter-bladder X-ray and US imaging. Pain was evaluated by use of the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). Results: The NPRS scores were highest in the xylocaine group at 10, 20, and 30 minutes (p=0.0001) with no significant difference between the ketorolac and pethidine groups, except at 10 minutes (p=0.03) and a near significant difference at 30 minutes (p=0.054) in favor of ketorolac. Results for stone disintegration (none, partial, and complete, respectively) were as follows: 25 (50.0%), 23 (46.0%), and 2 (4.0%) for pethidine; 19 (35.8%), 23 (43.4%), and 11 (20.8%) for ketorolac; and 26 (89.7%), 3 (10.3%), and 0 (0.0%) for lidocaine (p=0.008). Conclusions: Ketorolac is a safe and more effective alternative to morphine derivatives for SWL analgesia. Lidocaine gel should not be used as mono-analgesia for SWL.

Indexed as

AdultAnalgesiaAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalFemaleGelsHumansKetorolacLidocaineLithotripsyMaleMeperidineMiddle AgedPainAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalGelsKetorolacLidocaineMeperidineAnalgesiaKetorolacLithotripsy

Identifiers

PMID31294134
PMCPMC6607066
OpenAlexW2954828959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.