Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31294010›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2019

Toward Personalized Tinnitus Treatment: An Exploratory Study Based on Internet Crowdsensing.

Jorge Simoes, Patrick Neff, Stefan Schoisswohl, Jan Bulla, Martin Schecklmann, Steve Harrison, Markku Vesala, Berthold Langguth, Winfried Schlee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Systematic Review on Healthcare and Societal Costs of Tinnitus.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Current State of Tinnitus Diagnosis and Treatment: a Multidisciplinary Expert Perspective.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2024
    Review
  8. Tinnitus: Clinical Insights in Its Pathophysiology-A Perspective.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Insomnia Associated with Tinnitus and Gender Differences.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jorge SimoesDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Patrick NeffDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Stefan SchoisswohlDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Jan BullaDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Martin SchecklmannDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Steve HarrisonTinnitus Hub, Hemsworth, United Kingdom.
Markku VesalaTinnitus Hub, Hemsworth, United Kingdom.
Berthold LangguthDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Winfried SchleeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

crowdsensingheterogeneitypersonalized treatmentsmart devicetinnitus

Identifiers

PMID31294010
PMCPMC6604754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.