Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31293986›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2019

Cepharanthine Hydrochloride Improves Cisplatin Chemotherapy and Enhances Immunity by Regulating Intestinal Microbes in Mice.

Pengjun Zhou, Ziyao Li, Dandan Xu, Ying Wang, Qi Bai, Yue Feng, Guifeng Su, Pengxiao Chen, Yao Wang, Huizhong Liu and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pharmacological Activity of Cepharanthine.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Administration ofNutrients · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Pengjun ZhouGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Bioengineering Medicine, Guangzhou Jinan Biomedicine Research and Development Center, College of Life Science and Technology, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Ziyao LiGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Bioengineering Medicine, Guangzhou Jinan Biomedicine Research and Development Center, College of Life Science and Technology, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Dandan XuGuangdong Food and Drug Vocational College, Guangzhou, China.
Ying WangCollege of Food Science and Technology, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou, China.
Qi BaiGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Bioengineering Medicine, Guangzhou Jinan Biomedicine Research and Development Center, College of Life Science and Technology, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Yue FengGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Bioengineering Medicine, Guangzhou Jinan Biomedicine Research and Development Center, College of Life Science and Technology, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Guifeng SuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Bioengineering Medicine, Guangzhou Jinan Biomedicine Research and Development Center, College of Life Science and Technology, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Pengxiao ChenGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Bioengineering Medicine, Guangzhou Jinan Biomedicine Research and Development Center, College of Life Science and Technology, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Yao WangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Bioengineering Medicine, Guangzhou Jinan Biomedicine Research and Development Center, College of Life Science and Technology, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Huizhong LiuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Xiaogang WangDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Rong ZhangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Yifei WangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Bioengineering Medicine, Guangzhou Jinan Biomedicine Research and Development Center, College of Life Science and Technology, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Jinan University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNGuangdong Food and Drug Vocational College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemotherapy is one of the major treatment strategies for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Unfortunately, most chemotherapeutic drugs have significant impacts on the intestinal microbes, resulting in side effects and reduced efficiency. Therefore, new strategies capable of overcoming these disadvantages of current chemotherapies are in urgent need. The natural product, Cepharanthine hydrochloride (CEH), is known for its anticancer and immunoregulatory properties. By sequencing the V4 region of 16S rDNA, we characterized the microbes of tumor-bearing mice treated with different chemotherapy strategies, including with CEH. We found that CEH improved the therapeutic effect of CDDP by manipulating the gut microbiota. Through metagenomic analyses of the microbes community, we identified a severe compositional and functional imbalance in the gut microbes community after CDDP treatment. However, CEH improved the effect of chemotherapy and ameliorated CDDP treatment-induced imbalance in the intestinal microbes. Mechanically, CEH activated TLR4 and MYD88 innate immune signaling, which is advantageous for the activation of the host's innate immunity to exert a balanced intestinal environment as well as to trigger a better chemotherapeutic response to esophageal cancer. In addition, TNFR death receptors were activated to induce apoptosis. In summary, our findings suggest that chemotherapy of CDDP combined with CEH increased the effect of chemotherapy and reduced the side effects on the microbes and intestinal mucosal immunity. We believe that these findings provide a theoretical basis for new clinical treatment strategies.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisBacteriaBenzodioxolesBenzylisoquinolinesCell Line, TumorCisplatinDisease Models, AnimalDNA, RibosomalDrug SynergismDrug TherapyEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAntineoplastic AgentsBenzodioxolesBenzylisoquinolinescepharanthineCisplatinDNA, RibosomalMyd88 protein, mouseMyeloid Differentiation Factor 88Tlr4 protein, mouseToll-Like Receptor 4cepharanthine hydrochloridechemotherapyesophageal cancergut microbesintestinal mucosal immunity

Identifiers

PMID31293986
PMCPMC6606789
OpenAlexW2953638444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.