Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31293846›Full record

ArticleThe mental health clinician2019

Impact on an integrated psychiatric pharmacy service in a primary care clinic.

Benjamin Chavez, Emily Kosirog

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The mental health clinician, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTraditionally, clinical pharmacists have been employed in the primary care setting to help manage chronic disease states, such as diabetes and hypertension. Although the benefits of pharmacists managing chronic conditions have been extensively published, published data for clinical pharmacist mental health services in primary care is limited to Veterans Affairs populations. This article describes a practice model in which pharmacists are providing psychiatric medication management and consultation in a federally qualified health center.

methodsA period of 1 year from the psychiatric pharmacy service was analyzed from April 1, 2017, to March 31, 2018. Reports were generated that included information about psychiatric pharmacy consults, 1-on-1 psychiatric pharmacy visits, and psychotropic medication prescribing/dispensing trends. Each consult was further reviewed for additional details, including patient characteristics, medications prescribed, psychiatric diagnoses involved, and actions taken.

resultsA review of this pharmacy service showed significant pharmacist involvement in psychiatric medication consults and 1-on-1 visits. Common disease states consulted on were depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, and neurologic disorders, which reflects psychiatric disease states commonly seen in primary care practice. Provider satisfaction survey results showed that the service was valued and that providers felt their comfort in prescribing psychotropic medications improved due to the service. DISCUSSION: The service described here exemplifies the potential for pharmacists in the ambulatory care setting to expand beyond the traditional chronic disease state management. It also speaks to a potential role for psychiatric pharmacists in the primary care setting.

Indexed as

clinical pharmacyprimary carepsychiatric pharmacy

Identifiers

PMID31293846
PMCPMC6607947
OpenAlexW2954383596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.