Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31293637›Full record

ReviewJournal of Cancer2019

Perspectives on Inflammatory Breast Cancer (IBC) Research, Clinical Management and Community Engagement from the Duke IBC Consortium.

Gayathri R Devi, Holly Hough, Nadine Barrett, Massimo Cristofanilli, Beth Overmoyer, Neil Spector, Naoto T Ueno, Wendy Woodward, John Kirkpatrick, Benjamin Vincent and 15 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of Cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Engaging Patient Advocates to Reduce Breast Cancer Disparities: Opportunities to Advance Breast Cancer Research and Engagement.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Standardized Definitions for Efficacy End Points in Neoadjuvant Breast Cancer Clinical Trials: NeoSTEEP.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Gayathri R DeviDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University.
Holly HoughDuke Office of Clinical Research, Duke University.
Nadine BarrettDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University.
Massimo CristofanilliDepartment of Medicine, Northwestern University.
Beth OvermoyerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.
Neil SpectorDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University.
Naoto T UenoDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Wendy WoodwardDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
John KirkpatrickDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University.
Benjamin VincentDivision of Hematology/Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Kevin P WilliamsDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, North Carolina Central University.
Charlotte FinleyDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University.
Brandi DuffDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University.
Valarie WorthyDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University.
Shannon McCallDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University.
Beth A HollisterDepartment of Surgery, Duke University.
Greg PalmerDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University.
Jeremy ForceDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University.
Kelly WestbrookDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University.
Oluwadamilola FayanjuDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University.
Gita SunejaDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University.
Susan F DentDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University.
E Shelley HwangDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University.
Steven R PatiernoDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University.
P Kelly MarcomDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University.
Duke Medical Center · USCancer Institute (WIA) · INDuke University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Women's Cancer Research ProgramP30CA014236 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JOHN N. NORTON · 1985 to 2026
$174.8M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002554 · NCATS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SVETKEY, LAURA P · 2018 to 2022
$8.2M
Pilot Project 2P20CA202925 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BARRETT, NADINE JOSANN · 2016 to 2019
$1.3M
Project 2: Identifying and modulating genetic modifiers of GLI1 activation in inflammatory breast cancer.P20CA202924 · NCI · NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY · PI PATIERNO, STEVEN R, WILLIAMS, KEVIN PETER · 2016 to 2019
$870k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002554NCI NIH HHS P20 CA202924NCI NIH HHS P20 CA202925NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is an understudied and aggressive form of breast cancer with a poor prognosis, accounting for 2-6% of new breast cancer diagnoses but 10% of all breast cancer-related deaths in the United States. Currently there are no therapeutic regimens developed specifically for IBC, and it is critical to recognize that all aspects of treating IBC - including staging, diagnosis, and therapy - are vastly different than other breast cancers. In December 2014, under the umbrella of an interdisciplinary initiative supported by the Duke School of Medicine, researchers, clinicians, research administrators, and patient advocates formed the Duke Consortium for IBC to address the needs of patients in North Carolina (an ethnically and economically diverse state with 100 counties) and across the Southeastern United States. The primary goal of this group is to translate research into action and improve both awareness and patient care through collaborations with local, national and international IBC programs. The consortium held its inaugural meeting on Feb 28, 2018, which also marked Rare Disease Day and convened national research experts, clinicians, patients, advocates, government representatives, foundation leaders, staff, and trainees. The meeting focused on new developments and challenges in the clinical management of IBC, research challenges and opportunities, and an interactive session to garner input from patients, advocates, and community partners that would inform a strategic plan toward continuing improvements in IBC patient care, research, and education.

Indexed as

advocacybreast cancercommunity engagementinflammatory breast cancerorphan diseasepatient-centered

Identifiers

PMID31293637
PMCPMC6603420
OpenAlexW2949297529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.