Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31293610›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2019

Cyberinfrastructure to Improve Forest Health and Productivity: The Role of Tree Databases in Connecting Genomes, Phenomes, and the Environment.

Jill L Wegrzyn, Margaret A Staton, Nathaniel R Street, Dorrie Main, Emily Grau, Nic Herndon, Sean Buehler, Taylor Falk, Sumaira Zaman, Risharde Ramnath and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Tripal MegaSearch: a tool for interactive and customizable query and download of big data.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jill L WegrzynDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States.
Margaret A StatonDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, United States.
Nathaniel R StreetUmeå Plant Science Centre, Department of Plant Physiology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Dorrie MainDepartment of Horticulture, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States.
Emily GrauDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States.
Nic HerndonDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States.
Sean BuehlerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States.
Taylor FalkDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States.
Sumaira ZamanDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States.
Risharde RamnathDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States.
Peter RichterDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States.
Lang SunDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States.
Bradford CondonDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, United States.
Abdullah AlmsaeedDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, United States.
Ming ChenDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, United States.
Chanaka MannapperumaUmeå Plant Science Centre, Department of Plant Physiology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Sook JungDepartment of Horticulture, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States.
Stephen FicklinDepartment of Horticulture, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States.
University of Connecticut · USUniversity of Tennessee at Knoxville · USWashington State University · USUmeå Plant Science Centre · SEUmeå University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite tremendous advancements in high throughput sequencing, the vast majority of tree genomes, and in particular, forest trees, remain elusive. Although primary databases store genetic resources for just over 2,000 forest tree species, these are largely focused on sequence storage, basic genome assemblies, and functional assignment through existing pipelines. The tree databases reviewed here serve as secondary repositories for community data. They vary in their focal species, the data they curate, and the analytics provided, but they are united in moving toward a goal of centralizing both data access and analysis. They provide frameworks to view and update annotations for complex genomes, interrogate systems level expression profiles, curate data for comparative genomics, and perform real-time analysis with genotype and phenotype data. The organism databases of today are no longer simply catalogs or containers of genetic information. These repositories represent integrated cyberinfrastructure that support cross-site queries and analysis in web-based environments. These resources are striving to integrate across diverse experimental designs, sequence types, and related measures through ontologies, community standards, and web services. Efficient, simple, and robust platforms that enhance the data generated by the research community, contribute to improving forest health and productivity.

Indexed as

bioinformaticscontent management systemdatabaseforest treeweb services

Identifiers

PMID31293610
PMCPMC6603172
OpenAlexW2955150211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.