ReviewJournal of Korean medical science2019
Comprehensive Approach to Open Access Publishing: Platforms and Tools.
Review in Journal of Korean medical science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article processing charges in colorectal surgery journals: a cross-sectional bibliometric analysis of cost, citation impact, and geographic disparity.Annals of coloproctology · 2026Article
- Publication activity trends in the field of social media in rheumatology: a Web of Science-based bibliometric analysis.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
- Advancing Research, Writing, and Publishing in Nursing: Addressing Challenges and Improving Standards.Journal of Korean medical science · 2024Review
- CAse-BAsed REview sTandards (CABARET): Considerations for Authors, Reviewers, and Editors.Journal of Korean medical science · 2024Review
- Ethics for Disseminating Health-Related Information on YouTube.Journal of Korean medical science · 2024Article
- Research Integrity: Where We Are and Where We Are Heading.Journal of Korean medical science · 2023Review
- Trans-O-MIM-An International Research Project on Open Access Transformation: Outcomes and Lessons Learned.Methods of information in medicine · 2023Article
- Patients with rheumatic diseases are ready to use social media in clinical practice; what about rheumatologists? A cross-sectional survey.Rheumatology international · 2022Article
- Harnessing the True Power of Altmetrics to Track Engagement.Journal of Korean medical science · 2021Article
- Literature search strategies in dental education and research.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2021Review
- Modern Health Journalism and the Impact of Social Media.Journal of Korean medical science · 2021Article
- Top Central Asian Educational Institutions on Publons: Analysis of Researchers and Reviewers.Journal of Korean medical science · 2021Article
- Article-Level Metrics.Journal of Korean medical science · 2021Review
- An Integrated Guide for Designing Video Abstracts Using Freeware and Their Emerging Role in Academic Research Advancement.Journal of Korean medical science · 2021Article
- Social Media for Scholarly Communication in Central Asia and Its Neighbouring Countries.Journal of Korean medical science · 2021Article
- Social media platforms: a primer for researchers.Reumatologia · 2021Article
- Scholarly publishing and journal targeting in the time of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: a cross-sectional survey of rheumatologists and other specialists.Rheumatology international · 2020Article
- Diversifying online rheumatology education options in the era of COVID-19.Clinical rheumatology · 2020Article
- Letter to the Editor: Social Media Is a Double-Edged Sword in the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of Korean medical science · 2020Article
- Information and Misinformation on COVID-19: a Cross-Sectional Survey Study.Journal of Korean medical science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Open Access Initiative is gaining momentum due to the worldwide availability of advanced digital tools, online publishing platforms, and systems for tracking academic contributions. Several declarations and initiatives, including Plan S, have already laid a foundation for moving away from subscription to full and immediate open-access publishing. The global initiatives imply targeting journals satisfying the upgraded quality and visibility criteria. To meet these criteria, a comprehensive approach to Open Access is recommended. This article overviews the essential components of the comprehensive approach, increasing transparency, adherence to ethical standards, and diversification of evaluation metrics. With the increasing volume of quality open-access journals, their indexing with free databases and search engines is becoming increasingly important. The Directory of Open Access Journals and PubMed Central currently free searches of open-access sources. These services, however, cannot fully satisfy the increasing demands of the users, and attempts are underway to upgrade the indexing and archiving of open-access sources in China, Japan, Korea, Russia, and elsewhere. The wide use of identifiers is essential for transparency of scholarly communications. Peer reviewers are now offered credits from Publons. These credits are transferrable to their Open Researcher and Contributor iDs. Various social media channels are increasingly used by scholars to comment on articles. All these comments are tracked by related metric systems, such as Altmetrics. Combined with traditional citation evaluations, the alternative metrics can help timely identify and promote publications influencing education, research, and practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.