Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31293018›Full record

ArticleHealth & social care in the community2019

Optimizing access to and use of formal dementia care: Qualitative findings from the European Actifcare study.

Liselot Kerpershoek, Claire Wolfs, Frans Verhey, Hannah Jelley, Bob Woods, Anja Bieber, Gabriele Bartoszek, Astrid Stephan, Geir Selbaek, Siren Eriksen and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health & social care in the community, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Liselot KerpershoekAlzheimer Centre Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6774-3480
Claire WolfsAlzheimer Centre Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Frans VerheyAlzheimer Centre Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Hannah JelleyBangor University, Bangor, UK.
Bob WoodsBangor University, Bangor, UK.
Anja BieberMartin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
Gabriele BartoszekMartin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
Astrid StephanMartin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
Geir SelbaekNorwegian National Advisory Unit on Ageing and Health, Vestfold Hospital, Tonsberg, Norway.
Siren EriksenNorwegian National Advisory Unit on Ageing and Health, Vestfold Hospital, Tonsberg, Norway.
Britt-Marie SjölundAging Research Center (ARC), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society (NVS), Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Louise HopperSchool of Nursing and Human Sciences, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
Kate IrvingSchool of Nursing and Human Sciences, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
Maria J MarquesCEDOC, Nova Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Manuel Gonçalves-PereiraCEDOC, Nova Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Daniel PortolaniIRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.
Orazio ZanettiIRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.
Marjolein VugtAlzheimer Centre Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Actifcare Consortium

Funding

JPND 733051001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper reports on qualitative data from the Actifcare study investigating experiences, attitudes, barriers and facilitators concerning access to and use of formal care. A total of 85 semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted in eight European countries. Results were analysed with a deductive content analysis, first within country and then integrated in a cross-national analysis. Overall, analysis of the in-depth interviews revealed two major themes with five subcategories. The results can be summarised in an optimal pathway for access to dementia care. This pathway includes fixed factors such as disease-related factors and system-related factors. In addition there are personal factors that are subject to change such as attitudes towards care. An important finding consisted of the necessity of having sufficient information about the disease and available care and having a key contact person to guide you through the process of finding suitable care while monitoring your needs. In addition, it is important to involve your social network as they can take on care-giving tasks. It is helpful to have a diagnosis (in most countries). Concerning decision-making, the person closest to the person with dementia is in the majority of cases the one who makes the ultimate decision to access and use services and he/she should therefore be supported in this process. These results provide insight into the factors that influence the pathway to formal care use and help professionals to enhance access to formal dementia care by focusing on factors that can be modified.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversDecision MakingDementiaEuropeFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchaccess to caredementiain-depth interviewsinformal careservice use

Identifiers

PMID31293018
PMCPMC6851600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.