Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31292854›Full record

SynthesisSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2019

Match and Training Injuries in Women's Rugby Union: A Systematic Review of Published Studies.

Doug King, Patria Hume, Cloe Cummins, Alan Pearce, Trevor Clark, Andrew Foskett, Matt Barnes

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Injuries in Netball-A Systematic Review.Sports medicine - open · 2021
    Pooled it
  6. Injury Profile of Male and Female Senior and Youth Handball Players: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Breast-Related Issues in Community-Based Women's Rugby Union.European journal of sport science · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Traumatic muscle injury.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Doug KingSchool of Sport, Exercise and Nutrition, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand. dking30@une.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0135-0937
Patria HumeSport Performance Research Institute New Zealand (SPRINZ), Faculty of Health and Environment Science, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Cloe CumminsSchool of Science and Technology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia.
Alan PearceDepartment of Rehabilitation, Nutrition and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Trevor ClarkSports Performance, Faculty of Human Performance, Australian College of Physical Education, Sydney Olympic Park, NSW, Australia.
Andrew FoskettSchool of Sport, Exercise and Nutrition, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand.
Matt BarnesSchool of Sport, Exercise and Nutrition, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand.
Massey University · NZAuckland University of Technology · NZAustralian College of Physical Education · AUAustralian Football League · AULa Trobe University · AUUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a paucity of studies reporting on women's injuries in rugby union.

objectiveThe aim of this systematic review was to describe the injury epidemiology for women's rugby-15s and rugby-7s match and training environments.

methodsSystematic searches of PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, CINAHL(EBSCO) and ScienceDirect databases using keywords.

resultsTen articles addressing the incidence of injury in women's rugby union players were retrieved and included. The pooled incidence of injuries in women's rugby-15s was 19.6 (95% CI 17.7-21.7) per 1000 match-hours (h). Injuries in women's rugby-15s varied from 3.6 (95% CI 2.5-5.3) per 1000 playing-h (including training and games) to 37.5 (95% CI 26.5-48.5) per 1000 match-h. Women's rugby-7s had a pooled injury incidence of 62.5 (95% CI 54.7-70.4) per 1000 player-h and the injury incidence varied from 46.3 (95% CI 38.7-55.4) per 1000 match-h to 95.4 (95% CI 79.9-113.9) per 1000 match-h. The tackle was the most commonly reported injury cause with the ball carrier recording more injuries at the collegiate [5.5 (95% CI 4.5-6.8) vs. 3.5 (95% CI 2.7-4.6) per 1000 player-game-h; χ DISCUSSION: Women's rugby-7s had a higher un-pooled injury incidence than women's rugby-15s players based on rugby-specific surveys and hospitalisation data. The incidence of injury in women's rugby-15s and rugby-7s was lower than men's professional rugby-15s and rugby-7s competitions but similar to male youth rugby-15s players. Differences in reporting methodologies limited comparison of results.

conclusionWomen's rugby-7s resulted in a higher injury incidence than women's rugby-15s. The head/face was the most commonly reported injury site. The tackle was the most common cause of injury in both rugby-7s and rugby-15s at all levels. Future studies are warranted on injuries in women's rugby-15s and rugby-7s. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018109054 (last updated on 17 January 2019).

Indexed as

Athletic InjuriesBrain ConcussionFemaleFootballHumansIncidenceSprains and Strains

Identifiers

PMID31292854
OpenAlexW2957848580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.