Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31292825›Full record

ReviewAIDS and behavior2019

Expanding Knowledge About Implementation of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP): A Methodological Review.

Rogério M Pinto, Ashley Lacombe-Duncan, Emma Sophia Kay, Kathryn R Berringer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in AIDS and behavior, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Implementing PrEP Services in Diverse Health Care Settings.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rogério M PintoUniversity of Michigan, School of Social Work, Office 2850, 1080 South University, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. ropinto@umich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6077-3406
Ashley Lacombe-DuncanUniversity of Michigan, School of Social Work, Office 2850, 1080 South University, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Emma Sophia KayUniversity of Michigan, School of Social Work, Office 2850, 1080 South University, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Kathryn R BerringerUniversity of Michigan, School of Social Work, Office 2850, 1080 South University, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methodological limitations in PrEP implementation studies may explain why PrEP implementation is lagging. This methodological review provides a description and critique of the methods used to identify barriers to PrEP implementation in the United States (2007-18). For each selected article, we provide: (1) research questions; (2) measures; (3) design; (4) sample (size and type); and (5) theoretical orientation. Among 79 articles which identified knowledge, attitudes, and behavioral and social/structural barriers to PrEP implementation, 51 (65%) were quantitative; 25 (32%) qualitative; and 3 (4%) were mixed-methods; overall, just one-half described a conceptual approach. About two-thirds of articles were conducted with patients and one-third with healthcare providers. Our review reveals a paucity of longitudinal, mixed-methods, and ethnographic/observational research and guiding theoretical frameworks; thus, the applicability of results are limited. We recommend that interventions aimed at PrEP implementation address barriers situated at multiple ecological domains, and thus improve PrEP access, uptake, and adherence.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePre-Exposure ProphylaxisAnti-HIV AgentsHealth PersonnelHIV InfectionsHumansMaleUnited StatesAnti-HIV AgentsContinuum of careHIV preventionPrEP implementation methodsPrEP methodological review

Identifiers

PMID31292825
PMCPMC6789046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.