Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31292712›Full record

ReviewMycorrhiza2019

Taxi drivers: the role of animals in transporting mycorrhizal fungi.

Martina Vašutová, Piotr Mleczko, Alvaro López-García, Irena Maček, Gergely Boros, Jan Ševčík, Saori Fujii, Davorka Hackenberger, Ivan H Tuf, Elisabeth Hornung and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Mycorrhiza, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
14.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Three new species ofMycoscience · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 11 institutions in 9 countries.

Martina VašutováGlobal Change Research Institute, Czech Academy of Sciences, Lipová 1789/9, 37005, České Budějovice, Czech Republic. vasutova.m@czechglobe.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0128-874X
Piotr MleczkoInstitute of Botany, Faculty of Biology, Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Gronostajowa 3, 30-387, Kraków, Poland.
Alvaro López-GarcíaDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Irena MačekBiotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Jamnikarjeva 101, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Gergely BorosDepartment of Zoology and Animal Ecology, Szent István University, Páter Károly u. 1., Gödöllö, Hungary.
Jan ŠevčíkDepartment of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science, University of Ostrava, Chittussiho 10, 71000, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Saori FujiiInsect Ecology Laboratory, Department of Forest Entomology, Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, 1 Matsunosato, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8687, Japan.
Davorka HackenbergerDepartment of Biology, University of Osijek, Cara Hadrijana 8a, Osijek, Croatia.
Ivan H TufDepartment of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, Palacký University Olomouc, Šlechtitelů 27, 77900, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Elisabeth HornungDepartment of Ecology, Institute for Biology, University of Veterinary Medicine Budapest, Rottenbiller str. 50, Budapest, 1077, Hungary.
Barna Páll-GergelyCentre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Herman Ottó str. 15, Budapest, 1022, Hungary.
Rasmus KjøllerDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKCentre for Agricultural Research · HUForestry and Forest Products Research Institute · JPJagiellonian University · PLMagyar Agrár- és Élettudományi Egyetem · HUPalacký University Olomouc · CZSewanee: The University of the South · USUniversity of Osijek · HRUniversity of Ostrava · CZUniversity of Primorska · SIUniversity of Veterinary Medicine · HU

Funding

COST Action FP1305Czech Ministry of Agriculture QJ1630422Danish Council for Strategic Research 0606-00587BEuropean Union's Horizon 2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship 708530 - DISPMICGrantová Agentura České Republiky 31-19-15031SMinisterstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy LO1415Slovenian Research Agency J4-7052Slovenian Research Agency P4-008Spanish government CGL2015-69118-C2-2-P - COEXMED-IIUniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie K/ZDS/007340, K/ZDS/007344
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dispersal of mycorrhizal fungi via animals and the importance for the interacting partners' life history as well as for ecosystems is an understudied topic. In this review, we describe the available evidence and the most important knowledge gaps and finally suggest ways to gain the missing information. So far, 33 articles have been published proving a successful transfer of mycorrhizal propagules by animals. The vast majority of research on invertebrates was focused on arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi, whereas papers on vertebrates (mainly rodents and artiodactyls) equally addressed ectomycorrhizal (ECM) and AM fungi. Effective dispersal has been mostly shown by the successful inoculation of bait plants and less commonly by spore staining or germination tests. Based on the available data and general knowledge on animal lifestyles, collembolans and oribatid mites may be important in transporting ECM fungal propagules by ectozoochory, whereas earthworms, isopods, and millipedes could mainly transfer AM fungal spores in their gut systems. ECM fungal distribution may be affected by mycophagous dipterans and their hymenopteran parasitoids, while slugs, snails, and beetles could transport both mycorrhizal groups. Vertebrates feeding on fruit bodies were shown to disperse mainly ECM fungi, while AM fungi are transported mostly accidentally by herbivores. The important knowledge gaps include insufficient information on dispersal of fungal propagules other than spores, the role of invertebrates in the dispersal of mycorrhizal fungi, the way in which propagules pass through food webs, and the spatial distances reached by different dispersal mechanisms both horizontally and vertically.

Indexed as

Food ChainAnimalsFungiInvertebratesMycorrhizaeSoil MicrobiologySymbiosisArbuscular mycorrhizaBiodiversityDispersalEctomycorrhizaFungal traitsZoochory

Identifiers

PMID31292712
OpenAlexW2958525888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.