Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31292535›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2019

Multi-omic molecular comparison of primary versus metastatic pancreatic tumours.

Gagandeep Brar, Edik M Blais, R Joseph Bender, Jonathan R Brody, Davendra Sohal, Subha Madhavan, Vincent J Picozzi, Andrew E Hendifar, Vincent M Chung, David Halverson and 5 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Chemotherapy-associated mutational process signature and genomic alterations associated with outcome in metastatic pancreatic cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. ERCC1/NGFR affects prognosis in basal-like breast cancer.European journal of medical research · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. HMGA2 Expression Predicts Subtype, Survival, and Treatment Outcome in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Prognostic value of theTherapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Gagandeep BrarLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Edik M BlaisPerthera Inc, Mclean, VA, USA.
R Joseph BenderPerthera Inc, Mclean, VA, USA.
Jonathan R BrodySidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Davendra SohalCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Subha MadhavanLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Vincent J PicozziVirginia Mason Hospital and Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Andrew E HendifarCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Vincent M ChungCity of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA.
David HalversonPerthera Inc, Mclean, VA, USA.
Sameh MikhailMark H. Zangmeister Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Lynn M MatrisianPancreatic Cancer Action Network, Manhattan Beach, CA, USA.
Lola RahibPancreatic Cancer Action Network, Manhattan Beach, CA, USA.
Emanuel PetricoinPerthera Inc, Mclean, VA, USA.
Michael J PishvaianLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA. pishvaim@georgetown.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMolecular profiling is increasingly used to match patients with metastatic cancer to targeted therapies, but obtaining a high-quality biopsy specimen from metastatic sites can be difficult.

methodsPatient samples were received by Perthera to coordinate genomic, proteomic and/or phosphoproteomic testing, using a specimen from either the primary tumour or a metastatic site. The relative frequencies were compared across specimen sites to assess the potential limitations of using a primary tumour sample for clinical decision support.

resultsNo significant differences were identified at the gene or pathway level when comparing genomic alterations between primary and metastatic lesions. Site-specific trends towards enrichment of MYC amplification in liver lesions, STK11 mutations in lung lesions and ATM and ARID2 mutations in abdominal lesions were seen, but were not statistically significant after false-discovery rate correction. Comparative analyses of proteomic results revealed significantly elevated expression of ERCC1 and TOP1 in metastatic lesions.

conclusionsTumour tissue limitations remain a barrier to precision oncology efforts, and these real-world data suggest that performing molecular testing on a primary tumour specimen could be considered in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who do not have adequate tissue readily available from a metastatic site.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsFemaleGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasm MetastasisPancreatic NeoplasmsProteomicsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycTranscription FactorsARID2 protein, humanAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsATM protein, humanMYC protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID31292535
PMCPMC6738081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.