Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31292525›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Differential expression of individual transcript variants of PD-1 and PD-L2 genes on Th-1/Th-2 status is guaranteed for prognosis prediction in PCNSL.

Yasuo Takashima, Atsushi Kawaguchi, Ryuichi Sato, Kenichi Yoshida, Azusa Hayano, Jumpei Homma, Junya Fukai, Yasuo Iwadate, Koji Kajiwara, Shin Ishizawa and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. CD4Trends in cancer · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Yasuo TakashimaLaboratory of Molecular Target Therapy for Cancer, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Atsushi KawaguchiCenter for Comprehensive Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan.
Ryuichi SatoDepartment of Genomic Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Kenichi YoshidaDepartment of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Azusa HayanoLaboratory of Molecular Target Therapy for Cancer, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Jumpei HommaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Toyama Prefectural Central Hospital, Toyama, Japan.
Junya FukaiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Wakayama Medical University School of Medicine, Wakayama, Japan.
Yasuo IwadateDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Koji KajiwaraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Shin IshizawaDepartment of Pathology, Toyama Prefectural Central Hospital, Toyama, Japan.
Hiroaki HondohDepartment of Neurosurgery, Toyama Prefectural Central Hospital, Toyama, Japan.
Masakazu NakanoDepartment of Genomic Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Seishi OgawaDepartment of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Kei TashiroDepartment of Genomic Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Ryuya YamanakaLaboratory of Molecular Target Therapy for Cancer, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan. ryaman@koto.kpu-m.ac.jp.
Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine · JPToyama Prefectural Central Hospital · JPKyoto University · JPChiba University · JPSaga University · JPWakayama Medical University · JPYamaguchi University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In current molecular medicine, next-generation sequencing (NGS) for transcript variant detection and multivariable analyses are valid methods for evaluating gene expression, cancer mechanisms, and prognoses of patients. We conducted RNA-sequencing on samples from patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) using NGS and performed multivariable analysis on gene expression data and correlations focused on Th-1/Th-2 helper T cell balance and immune checkpoint to identify diagnosis/prognosis markers and cancer immune pathways in PCNSL. We selected 84 transcript variants to limit the analysis range for Th-1/Th-2 balance and stimulatory and inhibitory checkpoints in 31 PCNSLs. Of these, 21 highly-expressed transcript variants were composed of the formulas for prognoses based on Th-1/Th-2 status and checkpoint activities. Using formulas, Th-1

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProgrammed Cell Death 1 Ligand 2 ProteinProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorSequence Analysis, RNAPDCD1LG2 protein, humanPDCD1 protein, humanProgrammed Cell Death 1 Ligand 2 ProteinProgrammed Cell Death 1 Receptor

Identifiers

PMID31292525
PMCPMC6620277
OpenAlexW2962656685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.