Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31292479›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Frequent Prescribed Fires Can Reduce Risk of Tick-borne Diseases.

Elizabeth R Gleim, Galina E Zemtsova, Roy D Berghaus, Michael L Levin, Mike Conner, Michael J Yabsley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Can restoration of fire-dependent ecosystems reduce ticks and tick-borne disease prevalence in the eastern United States?Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Baptism of Fire: Modeling the Effects of Prescribed Fire on Lyme Disease.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2022
    Article
  17. Arthropods and Fire Within the Biologically Diverse Longleaf Pine Ecosystem.Annals of the Entomological Society of America · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. TheFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth R GleimWarnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources & Southeastern Cooperative Wildlife Disease Study, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA. egleim@hollins.edu.
Galina E ZemtsovaCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Rickettsial Zoonoses Branch, Atlanta, GA, 30029, USA.
Roy D BerghausCollege of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
Michael L LevinCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Rickettsial Zoonoses Branch, Atlanta, GA, 30029, USA.
Mike ConnerJones Center at Ichauway, Newton, GA, 39870, USA.
Michael J YabsleyWarnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources & Southeastern Cooperative Wildlife Disease Study, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2452-5015
University of Georgia · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USThe Jones Center at Ichauway · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, a two-year study found that long-term prescribed fire significantly reduced tick abundance at sites with varying burn regimes (burned surrounded by burned areas [BB], burned surrounded by unburned areas [BUB], and unburned surrounded by burned areas [UBB]). In the current study, these ticks were tested for pathogens to more directly investigate the impacts of long-term prescribed burning on human disease risk. A total of 5,103 ticks (4,607 Amblyomma americanum, 76 Amblyomma maculatum, 383 Ixodes scapularis, two Ixodes brunneus, and 35 Dermacentor variabilis) were tested for Borrelia spp., Rickettsia spp., Ehrlichia spp., and Anaplasma phagocytophilum. Long-term prescribed fire did not significantly impact pathogen prevalence except that A. americanum from burned habitats had significantly lower prevalence of Rickettsia (8.7% and 4.6% for BUB and UBB sites, respectively) compared to ticks from control sites (unburned, surrounded by unburned [UBUB])(14.6%). However, during the warm season (spring/summer), encounter rates with ticks infected with pathogenic bacteria was significantly lower (98%) at burned sites than at UBUB sites. Thus, despite there being no differences in pathogen prevalence between burned and UBUB sites, risk of pathogen transmission is lower at sites subjected to long-term burning due to lower encounter rates with infected ticks.

Indexed as

DermacentorFiresIxodesTick-Borne DiseasesAnimalsBacteriaEcosystemFloridaGeorgiaHumansSeasons

Identifiers

PMID31292479
PMCPMC6620321
OpenAlexW2959224907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.