ArticleScientific reports2019
Neural Correlates of Variations in Human Trust in Human-like Machines during Non-reciprocal Interactions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding dimensions of trust in AI through quantitative cognition: Implications for human-AI collaboration.PloS one · 2025Article
- Empowering human-AI teams via Intentional Behavioral Synchrony.Frontiers in neuroergonomics · 2023Article
- Promises and trust in human-robot interaction.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Measurement of Trust in Automation: A Narrative Review and Reference Guide.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Review
- Neural Correlates of Trust in Automation: Considerations and Generalizability Between Technology Domains.Frontiers in neuroergonomics · 2021Review
- Biosignal-Based Attention Monitoring to Support Nuclear Operator Safety-Relevant Tasks.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As intelligent machines have become widespread in various applications, it has become increasingly important to operate them efficiently. Monitoring human operators' trust is required for productive interactions between humans and machines. However, neurocognitive understanding of human trust in machines is limited. In this study, we analysed human behaviours and electroencephalograms (EEGs) obtained during non-reciprocal human-machine interactions. Human subjects supervised their partner agents by monitoring and intervening in the agents' actions in this non-reciprocal interaction, which reflected practical uses of autonomous or smart systems. Furthermore, we diversified the agents with external and internal human-like factors to understand the influence of anthropomorphism of machine agents. Agents' internal human-likenesses were manifested in the way they conducted a task and affected subjects' trust levels. From EEG analysis, we could define brain responses correlated with increase and decrease of trust. The effects of trust variations on brain responses were more pronounced with agents who were externally closer to humans and who elicited greater trust from the subjects. This research provides a theoretical basis for modelling human neural activities indicate trust in partner machines and can thereby contribute to the design of machines to promote efficient interactions with humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.