Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31292472›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Identifying candidate genes for Phytophthora capsici resistance in pepper (Capsicum annuum) via genotyping-by-sequencing-based QTL mapping and genome-wide association study.

Muhammad Irfan Siddique, Hea-Young Lee, Na-Young Ro, Koeun Han, Jelli Venkatesh, Abate Mekonnen Solomon, Abhinandan Surgonda Patil, Amornrat Changkwian, Jin-Kyung Kwon, Byoung-Cheorl Kang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
20.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. BreedingFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Construction of a High-DensityInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Development and validation of KASP markers for resistance toMolecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Muhammad Irfan SiddiqueDepartment of Plant Science and Plant Genomics and Breeding Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
Hea-Young LeeDepartment of Plant Science and Plant Genomics and Breeding Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
Na-Young RoNational Academy of Agricultural Science, National Agrobiodiversity Center, Rural Development Administration, Jeonju, 54874, Republic of Korea.
Koeun HanDepartment of Plant Science and Plant Genomics and Breeding Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
Jelli VenkateshDepartment of Plant Science and Plant Genomics and Breeding Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
Abate Mekonnen SolomonDepartment of Plant Science and Plant Genomics and Breeding Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8501-4449
Abhinandan Surgonda PatilDepartment of Plant Science and Plant Genomics and Breeding Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9712-8219
Amornrat ChangkwianDepartment of Plant Science and Plant Genomics and Breeding Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
Jin-Kyung KwonDepartment of Plant Science and Plant Genomics and Breeding Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
Byoung-Cheorl KangDepartment of Plant Science and Plant Genomics and Breeding Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea. bk54@snu.ac.kr.
Seoul National University · KRRural Development Administration · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phytophthora capsici (Leon.) is a globally prevalent, devastating oomycete pathogen that causes root rot in pepper (Capsicum annuum). Several studies have identified quantitative trait loci (QTL) underlying resistance to P. capsici root rot (PcRR). However, breeding for pepper cultivars resistant to PcRR remains challenging due to the complexity of PcRR resistance. Here, we combined traditional QTL mapping with GWAS to broaden our understanding of PcRR resistance in pepper. Three major-effect loci (5.1, 5.2, and 5.3) conferring broad-spectrum resistance to three isolates of P. capsici were mapped to pepper chromosome P5. In addition, QTLs with epistatic interactions and minor effects specific to isolate and environment were detected on other chromosomes. GWAS detected 117 significant SNPs across the genome associated with PcRR resistance, including SNPs on chromosomes P5, P7, and P11 that colocalized with the QTLs identified here and in previous studies. Clusters of candidate nucleotide-binding site-leucine-rich repeat (NBS-LRR) and receptor-like kinase (RLK) genes were predicted within the QTL and GWAS regions; such genes often function in disease resistance. These candidate genes lay the foundation for the molecular dissection of PcRR resistance. SNP markers associated with QTLs for PcRR resistance will be useful for marker-assisted breeding and genomic selection in pepper breeding.

Indexed as

CapsicumChromosome MappingChromosomes, PlantDisease ResistanceGenes, PlantGenetic MarkersGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypePhytophthoraPlant DiseasesQuantitative Trait LociGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID31292472
PMCPMC6620314
OpenAlexW2958063199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.