Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31292268›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2020

Cumulative Antibiotic Use Significantly Decreases Efficacy of Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with Advanced Cancer.

Nadina Tinsley, Cong Zhou, Grace Tan, Samuel Rack, Paul Lorigan, Fiona Blackhall, Matthew Krebs, Louise Carter, Fiona Thistlethwaite, Donna Graham and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 124 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
124citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

124 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

64 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nadina TinsleyThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Cong ZhouCancer Research UK Manchester Institute, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Grace TanDivision of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Samuel RackDivision of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Paul LoriganThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Fiona BlackhallThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Matthew KrebsThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Louise CarterThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Fiona ThistlethwaiteThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Donna GrahamThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Natalie CookThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 29420Cancer Research UK C5759/A25254
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the advent of immunotherapy, substantial progress has been made in improving outcomes for patients with advanced cancer. However, not all patients benefit equally from treatment, and confounding immune-related issues may have an impact. Several studies suggest that antibiotic use (which alters the gut microbiome) may result in poorer outcomes for patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). MATERIALS AND

methodsThis is a large, single-site retrospective review of n = 291 patients with advanced cancer treated with ICI (n = 179 melanoma, n = 64 non-small cell lung cancer, and n = 48 renal cell carcinoma). Antibiotic use (both single and multiple courses/prolonged use) during the periods 2 weeks before and 6 weeks after ICI treatment was investigated.

resultsWithin this cohort, 92 patients (32%) received antibiotics. Patients who did not require antibiotics had the longest median progression-free survival (PFS), of 6.3 months, and longest median overall survival (OS), of 21.7 months. With other clinically relevant factors controlled, patients who received a single course of antibiotics had a shorter median OS (median OS, 17.7 months; p = .294), and patients who received multiple courses or prolonged antibiotic treatment had the worst outcomes overall (median OS, 6.3 months; p = .009). Progression-free survival times were similarly affected.

conclusionThis large, multivariate analysis demonstrated that antibiotic use is an independent negative predictor of PFS and OS in patients with advanced cancer treated with ICIs. This study highlighted worse treatment outcomes from patients with cumulative (multiple or prolonged courses) antibiotic use, which warrants further investigation and may subsequently inform clinical practice guidelines advocating careful use of antibiotics. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Antibiotic use is negatively associated with treatment outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in advanced cancer. Cumulative antibiotic use is associated with a marked negative survival outcome. Judicious antibiotic prescribing is warranted in patients receiving treatment with ICI for treatment of advanced malignancy.

Indexed as

AgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibodies, MonoclonalFemaleHumansImmunotherapyMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibodies, MonoclonalCheckpoint inhibitorsCumulative antibioticsImmunotherapyLung cancerMelanomaRenal cancer

Identifiers

PMID31292268
PMCPMC6964118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.