Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31292198›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN2019

Performance of GFR Slope as a Surrogate End Point for Kidney Disease Progression in Clinical Trials: A Statistical Simulation.

Tom Greene, Jian Ying, Edward F Vonesh, Hocine Tighiouart, Andrew S Levey, Josef Coresh, Jennifer S Herrick, Enyu Imai, Tazeen H Jafar, Bart D Maes and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Ertugliflozin and Slope of Chronic eGFR: Prespecified Analyses from the Randomized VERTIS CV Trial.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2021
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Prognosis and predictive factors in pediatric IgA nephropathy.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Considerations for Using eGFR Slope as an End Point in Clinical Trials.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2026
    Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 11 institutions in 6 countries.

Tom GreeneDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Jian YingDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Edward F VoneshDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Hocine TighiouartInstitute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies and.
Andrew S LeveyDivision of Nephrology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Josef CoreshDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jennifer S HerrickDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Enyu ImaiNakayamadera Imai Clinic, Takarazuka, Japan.
Tazeen H JafarProgram in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Bart D MaesAZ Delta, Roeselare, Belgium.
Ronald D PerroneDivision of Nephrology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Lucia Del VecchioDepartment of Nephrology and Dialysis, Alessandro Manzoni Hospital, Lecco, Italy.
Jack F M WetzelsDepartment of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; and.
Hiddo J L HeerspinkDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
Lesley A InkerDivision of Nephrology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; LInker@tuftsmedicalcenter.org.
Tufts Medical Center · USUniversity of Utah · USAlessandro Manzoni Hospital · ITAZ Delta · BEDuke-NUS Medical School · SGJohns Hopkins University · USNorthwestern University · USRadboud University Nijmegen · NLTakara (Japan) · JPTufts University · USUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute (Pilot Supplement)UL1TR002544 · NCATS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI SELKER, HARRY P. · 2018 to 2022
$50.2M
Utah Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR002538 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HESS, RACHEL, MAJERSIK, JENNIFER JUHL · 2018 to 2022
$26.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002538NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002544
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRandomized trials of CKD treatments traditionally use clinical events late in CKD progression as end points. This requires costly studies with large sample sizes and long follow-up. Surrogate end points like GFR slope may speed up the evaluation of new therapies by enabling smaller studies with shorter follow-up.

methodsWe used statistical simulations to identify trial situations where GFR slope provides increased statistical power compared with the clinical end point of doubling of serum creatinine or kidney failure. We simulated GFR trajectories based on data from 47 randomized treatment comparisons. We evaluated the sample size required for adequate statistical power based on GFR slopes calculated from baseline and from 3 months follow-up.

resultsIn most scenarios where the treatment has no acute effect, analyses of GFR slope provided similar or improved statistical power compared with the clinical end point, often allowing investigators to shorten follow-up by at least half while simultaneously reducing sample size. When patients' GFRs are higher, the power advantages of GFR slope increase. However, acute treatment effects within several months of randomization can increase the risk of false conclusions about therapies based on GFR slope. Care is needed in study design and analysis to avoid such false conclusions.

conclusionsUse of GFR slope can substantially increase statistical power compared with the clinical end point, particularly when baseline GFR is high and there is no acute effect. The optimum GFR-based end point depends on multiple factors including the rate of GFR decline, type of treatment effect and study design.

Indexed as

Glomerular Filtration RateModels, StatisticalBiomarkersComputer SimulationDisease ProgressionEndpoint DeterminationHumansKidney Failure, ChronicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRenal Insufficiency, ChronicTime FactorsBiomarkersCKD progressionend stage kidney diseaseGFR slopesimulation studies

Identifiers

PMID31292198
PMCPMC6727266
OpenAlexW2956225796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.