Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31292182›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2019

Validation of an algorithm using inpatient electronic health records to determine the presence and severity of cirrhosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in England: an observational study.

Robert J Driver, Vinay Balachandrakumar, Anya Burton, Jessica Shearer, Amy Downing, Tim Cross, Eva Morris, Ian A Rowe

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Robert J DriverLeeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8130-6164
Vinay BalachandrakumarRoyal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Anya BurtonNational Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Bristol, UK.
Jessica ShearerDepartment of Hepatology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Amy DowningLeeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0335-7801
Tim CrossRoyal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Eva MorrisLeeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1075-6544
Ian A RoweLeeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1288-0749
University of Leeds · GBRoyal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital NHS Trust · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBNational Cancer Registration Service · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L01629X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOutcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are determined by both cancer characteristics and liver disease severity. This study aims to validate the use of inpatient electronic health records to determine liver disease severity from treatment and procedure codes.

designRetrospective observational study.

settingTwo National Health Service (NHS) cancer centres in England.

participants339 patients with a new diagnosis of HCC between 2007 and 2016. MAIN OUTCOME: Using inpatient electronic health records, we have developed an optimised algorithm to identify cirrhosis and determine liver disease severity in a population with HCC. The diagnostic accuracy of the algorithm was optimised using clinical records from one NHS Trust and it was externally validated using anonymised data from another centre.

resultsThe optimised algorithm has a positive predictive value (PPV) of 99% for identifying cirrhosis in the derivation cohort, with a sensitivity of 86% (95% CI 82% to 90%) and a specificity of 98% (95% CI 96% to 100%). The sensitivity for detecting advanced stage cirrhosis is 80% (95% CI 75% to 87%) and specificity is 98% (95% CI 96% to 100%), with a PPV of 89%.

conclusionsOur optimised algorithm, based on inpatient electronic health records, reliably identifies and stages cirrhosis in patients with HCC. This highlights the potential of routine health data in population studies to stratify patients with HCC according to liver disease severity.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsElectronic Health RecordsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAscitesCarcinoma, HepatocellularEnglandEsophageal and Gastric VaricesFemaleGastrointestinal HemorrhageHepatitis B, ChronicHepatitis C, ChronicHumansLiver CirrhosisLiver Cirrhosis, Alcoholicepidemiologyhepatobiliary tumourshepatology

Identifiers

PMID31292182
PMCPMC6624046
OpenAlexW2961612545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.