Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31292138›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2019

MCF-7 as a Model for Functional Analysis of Breast Cancer Risk Variants.

Alix Booms, Gerhard A Coetzee, Steven E Pierce

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. ArXiv · 2024
    Article
  6. Differential Effect of 4Current medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alix BoomsCenter for Neurodegenerative Science, Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Gerhard A CoetzeeCenter for Neurodegenerative Science, Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, Michigan. gerry.coetzee@vai.org.
Steven E PierceCenter for Neurodegenerative Science, Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Van Andel Institute · US

Funding

Breast Cancer Risk EnhancersR01CA190182 · NCI · VAN ANDEL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI COETZEE, GERHARD A · 2015 to 2019
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA190182
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer genetic predisposition is governed by more than 142 loci as revealed by genome-wide association studies (GWAS). The functional contribution of these risk loci to breast cancer remains unclear, and additional post-GWAS analyses are required.

methodsWe identified active regulatory elements (enhancers, promoters, and chromatin organizing elements) by histone H3K27 acetylation and CTCF occupancy and determined the enrichment of risk variants at these sites. We compared these results with previously published data and for other cell lines, including human mammary epithelial cells, and related these data to gene expression.

resultsIn terms of mapping accuracy and resolution, our data augment previous annotations of the MCF-7 epigenome. After intersection with GWAS risk variants, we found 39 enhancers and 15 CTCF occupancy sites that, between them, overlapped 96 breast cancer credible risk variants at 42 loci. These risk enhancers likely regulate the expression of dozens of genes, which are enriched for GO categories, including estrogen and prolactin signaling.

conclusionsTen (of 142) breast cancer risk loci likely function via enhancers that are active in MCF-7 and are well suited to targeted manipulation in this system. In contrast, risk loci cannot be mapped to specific CTCF-binding sites, and the genes linked to risk CTCF sites did not show functional enrichment. The identity of risk enhancers and their associated genes suggests that some risk may function during later processes in cancer progression. IMPACT: Here, we report how the ER

Indexed as

MCF-7 CellsModels, GeneticBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCCCTC-Binding FactorFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyHaplotypesHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePromoter Regions, GeneticRisk FactorsBiomarkers, TumorCCCTC-Binding FactorCTCF protein, human

Identifiers

PMID31292138
PMCPMC6774879
OpenAlexW2960665815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.