Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31292007›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of surgical oncology2019

Bacterial colonization of seromas after breast cancer surgery with and without local steroid prophylaxis.

Christen Kirk Axelsson, Gro Maria Qvamme, Mette Okholm, Charlotte Lanng, Magnus Arpi, Minea Bruusgaard Mortensen, Birgitte Wegeberg, Pal Bela Szecsi

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyObservational StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of surgical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Nonlethal Full-Thickness Flame Burn Produces a Seroma Beneath the Forming Eschar, Thereby Promoting Pseudomonas aeruginosa Sepsis in Mice.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christen Kirk AxelssonDepartment of Breast Surgery F, University of Copenhagen, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Gro Maria QvammeDepartment of Breast Surgery F, University of Copenhagen, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Mette OkholmDepartment of Breast Surgery F, University of Copenhagen, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Charlotte LanngDepartment of Breast Surgery F, University of Copenhagen, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Magnus ArpiDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Minea Bruusgaard MortensenDepartment of Breast Surgery F, University of Copenhagen, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Birgitte WegebergDepartment of Breast Surgery F, University of Copenhagen, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Pal Bela SzecsiDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Copenhagen, Holbæk Hospital, Holbæk, Denmark. psz@regionsjaelland.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3446-0411
University of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeroma formation is a frequent postoperative sequela after mastectomy for primary breast cancer. We investigated the role of bacterial colonization of seroma fluid with three different culture methods and the effect of intracavitary steroids.

methodsThe study group consisted of 212 patients scheduled for mastectomy from a previously performed double-blind randomized placebo-controlled intervention trial. The patients were allocated to a single dose of 80 mg of steroids (methylprednisolone) or saline, and the effect on seroma formation was investigated. From each aspiration, an equal volume of seroma fluid (10 mL) was distributed into one sterile transport tube (conventional method), one aerobic blood culture bottle and one anaerobic blood culture bottle.

resultsThere was significant variation in the number of bacterial species detected in seroma samples among the three culture methods, ranging from 18 species with the conventional culture tubes to 40 species with aerobic blood culture bottles. Patients receiving prophylactic steroids had significantly more frequent colonization than those in the saline group. Nevertheless, the clinical surgical site infection rate of 7.0% was equal between the two groups.

conclusionsIn general, data analysis of the entire set of case material did not succeed in demonstrating a relationship between a specific bacterial species or a combination of species and seroma formation. However, in the few patients with growth of a pathogenic species, both the duration of seroma formation and volume of seroma fluid were more pronounced.

trial registrationEthics Committee of Copenhagen (H-4-2009-137), (EudraCT number 2009-016650-40), the Danish Data Protection Agency (code J. no. F.750.75-2), and the Danish Health and Medicines Authority (sponsor protocol code number 23837). Start date November 2010.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacterial InfectionsBreast NeoplasmsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlucocorticoidsHumansMastectomyMethylprednisolonePrognosisSeromaSurgical Wound InfectionGlucocorticoidsMethylprednisoloneBreast cancerBreast neoplasmMicrobiologySeromaSteroidSurgerySurgical wound infection

Identifiers

PMID31292007
PMCPMC6621967
OpenAlexW2956702010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.