Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31291962›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2019

The view and policy of management of occupational health services on the performance of workers' health surveillance: a qualitative exploration.

Felicia S Los, Carel T J Hulshof, Judith K Sluiter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Felicia S LosCoronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. f.s.los@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7495-1971
Carel T J HulshofCoronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Judith K SluiterCoronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough workers' health surveillance is an important preventive activity, it is not regularly performed. In addition to the occupational physician, the management of occupational health services can also be involved in the performance of workers' health surveillance. The present study investigated the view and policy of the managements of occupational health services on the performance of workers' health surveillance by occupational physicians.

methodSemi-structured face-to-face interviews about the mission, view, and policy of the occupational health services with respect to workers' health surveillance were conducted with eighteen randomly selected board members of occupational health services in the Netherlands. The results were transcribed verbatim and were analysed using MAXQDA software to form themes and categories.

resultsThe first theme found was the view of the management of occupational health services. Categories found were mission statements of occupational health services and the attitude of the management of occupational health services towards workers' health surveillance. Three types of mission statements were mentioned by the board members: keeping workers at work, improving the health of workers, or helping the employer with sick-leave management. Both positive and negative attitudes towards workers' health surveillance appeared from the interviews. Some board members mentioned that workers' health surveillance can improve workers' health, and creates awareness about workers' health. Other board members mentioned that performing workers' health surveillance is eliciting problems, and that employers do not have a positive attitude towards workers' health surveillance. The second theme was the policy on performing workers' health surveillance. Categories found were the policy on performing workers' health surveillance towards companies, and the policy on performing workers' health surveillance towards professionals. Some occupational health services recommend workers' health surveillance to all companies. However, in general workers' health surveillance was only performed at request of companies, and no instructions or training programmes for occupational physicians were provided.

conclusionAlthough some of the mentioned views on workers' health surveillance are positive, the policy of occupational health services on workers' health surveillance does, so far, in general, not stimulate occupational physicians or employers to perform or organize workers' health surveillance.

Indexed as

Occupational HealthPopulation SurveillanceHealth Services ResearchHumansNetherlandsOccupational Health ServicesOrganizational PolicyQualitative ResearchManagementOccupational health serviceOccupational physicianWorkers’ health surveillance

Identifiers

PMID31291962
PMCPMC6617932
OpenAlexW2957804436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.