SynthesisBMC oral health2019
In vivo effectiveness and safety of probiotics on prophylaxis and treatment of oral candidiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC oral health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of probiotics in the management of oral candidiasis: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.Systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Harnessing probiotics against candidiasis: a systematic review of experimental and mechanistic evidence.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Pooled it
- The anti-fungal effect of miconazole and miconazole-loaded chitosan nanoparticles gels in diabetic patients with Oral candidiasis-randomized control clinical trial and microbiological analysis.BMC oral health · 2024Trial
- Burning Mouth Syndrome, the Oral Microbiome, and Lactic Acid Bacteria: A Comprehensive Review of Clinical Features, Microbial Dysbiosis, and Probiotic Therapeutic Potential.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- BLIS M18 probiotic cleanser: effects on color and surface properties of conventional, milled, and 3D-printed PMMA.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Review
- Molecular mechanisms, pathogenesis and therapeutic advances ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Probiotics, Prebiotics, Synbiotics, and Postbiotics Against Oral Candida in Children: A Review of Clinical Trials.Nutrients · 2025Review
- Exploring the Potential of Novel Animal-Origin Probiotics as Key Players in One Health: Opportunities and Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- The Impact of Vitamin Deficiencies on Oral Manifestations in Children.Dentistry journal · 2024Review
- Current progress on the microbial therapies for acute liver failure.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- Antifungal Effect of ProbioticJournal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran) · 2023Article
- The synergistic effects of hydroxychavicol and amphotericin B towards yeast-hyphae transition and the germination ofJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2023Article
- Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis HN019 has antimicrobial activity against endodontic pathogens in vitro.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2023Article
- Mucormycosis and Its Upsurge During COVID-19 Epidemic: An Updated Review.Current microbiology · 2023Review
- Probiotics, their prophylactic and therapeutic applications in human health development: A review of the literature.Heliyon · 2022Review
- Targeted Delivery of Probiotics: Perspectives on Research and Commercialization.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2022Review
- Oral infections in oral cancer survivors: A mini-review.Frontiers in oral health · 2022Review
- Probiotics for Oral Candidiasis: Critical Appraisal of the Evidence and a Path Forward.Frontiers in oral health · 2022Review
- COVID-19 associated mucormycosis: evolving technologies for early and rapid diagnosis.3 Biotech · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo systematically review and assess the in vivo effectiveness and safety of probiotics for prophylaxis and treating oral candidiasis.
methodsA literature search for studies published in English until August 1, 2018 was conducted in the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Randomized controlled clinical trials and experimental mouse animal model studies comparing probiotics (at any dosage and in any form) with control groups (placebo, blank control or other agents) and reporting outcomes of the prophylactic and therapeutic effects were considered for inclusion. A descriptive study and, potentially, a meta-analysis were planned.
resultsSix randomized controlled clinical trials and 5 controlled experiments of mouse animal models were included in the systematic review. Four randomized controlled clinical trials comparing a probiotics group with a placebo/blank control group in 480 elderly and denture wearers were included in the meta-analysis. The overall combined odds ratio of the (random effects) meta-analysis was 0.24 (95% CI =0.09-0.63, P < 0.01). The overall combined odds ratio of the (fixed effects) sensitivity analysis was 0.39 (95% CI =0.25-0.60, P < 0.01) by excluding a study with the smallest sample size. These analyses showed that there was a statistically significant difference in the effect of probiotics compared with the control groups in elderly and denture wearers. The remaining 2 studies compared probiotics with other agents in a population aged 18-75 years and children aged 6-14 years respectively, and were analyzed descriptively. Meta-analysis and descriptive analyses indicated that probiotics were potentially effective in reducing morbidity, improving clinical symptoms and reducing oral Candida counts in oral candidiasis. The biases of the included studies were low or uncertain. The relatively common complaints reported were gastrointestinal discomfort and unpleasant taste, and no severe adverse events were reported.
conclusionsProbiotics were superior to the placebo and blank control in preventing and treating oral candidiasis in the elderly and denture wearers. Although probiotics showed a favorable effect in treating oral candidiasis, more evidence is required to warrant their effectiveness when compared with conventional antifungal treatments. Moreover, data on the safety of probiotics are still insufficient, and further research is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.