Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31291895›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2019

Optimized PCR conditions minimizing the formation of chimeric DNA molecules from MPRA plasmid libraries.

Evgeniya S Omelina, Anton V Ivankin, Anna E Letiagina, Alexey V Pindyurin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Nanopore sequencing of PCR products enables multicopy gene family reconstruction.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Evgeniya S OmelinaInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Anton V IvankinInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Anna E LetiaginaInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Alexey V PindyurinInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia. a.pindyurin@mcb.nsc.ru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMassively parallel reporter assays (MPRAs) enable high-throughput functional evaluation of various DNA regulatory elements and their mutant variants. The assays are based on construction of highly diverse plasmid libraries containing two variable fragments, a region of interest (a sequence under study; ROI) and a barcode (BC) used to uniquely tag each ROI, which are separated by a constant spacer sequence. The sequences of BC-ROI combinations present in the libraries may be either known a priori or not. In the latter case, it is necessary to identify these combinations before performing functional experiments. Typically, this is done by PCR amplification of the BC-ROI regions with flanking primers, followed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) of the products. However, chimeric DNA molecules formed on templates with identical spacer fragment during the amplification process may substantially hamper the identification of genuine BC-ROI combinations, and as a result lower the performance of the assays.

resultsTo identify settings that minimize formation of chimeric products we tested a number of PCR amplification parameters, such as conventional and emulsion types of PCR, one- or two-round amplification strategies, amount of DNA template, number of PCR cycles, and the duration of the extension step. Using specific MPRA libraries as templates, we found that the two-round amplification of the BC-ROI regions with a very low initial template amount, an elongated extension step, and a specific number of PCR cycles result in as low as 0.30 and 0.32% of chimeric products for emulsion and conventional PCR approaches, respectively.

conclusionsWe have identified PCR parameters that ensure synthesis of specific (non-chimeric) products from highly diverse MPRA plasmid libraries. In addition, we found that there is a negligible difference in performance of emulsion and conventional PCR approaches performed with the identified settings.

Indexed as

Gene LibraryPlasmidsDNADNA PrimersHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingPolymerase Chain ReactionTemplates, GeneticDNADNA PrimersBarcodeChimeric DNA moleculesConventional PCREmulsion PCR (ePCR)Massively parallel reporter assay (MPRA)Next-generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID31291895
PMCPMC6620194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.