Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31291892›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2019

Allopolyploid origin in Rubus (Rosaceae) inferred from nuclear granule-bound starch synthase I (GBSSI) sequences.

Yan Wang, Qing Chen, Tao Chen, Jing Zhang, Wen He, Lin Liu, Ya Luo, Bo Sun, Yong Zhang, Hao-Ru Tang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparative genomics on chloroplasts of ChineseFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  2. The complete chloroplast genome and phylogenetic analysis ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Study on SupergenusPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yan WangInstitute of Pomology and Olericulture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Qing ChenCollege of Horticulture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Tao ChenCollege of Horticulture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Jing ZhangInstitute of Pomology and Olericulture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Wen HeCollege of Horticulture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Lin LiuXizang Agriculture and Animal Husbandry College, Linzhi, China.
Ya LuoCollege of Horticulture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Bo SunCollege of Horticulture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Yong ZhangCollege of Horticulture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Hao-Ru TangInstitute of Pomology and Olericulture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Xiao-Rong WangInstitute of Pomology and Olericulture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China. wangxr@sicau.edu.cn.
Sichuan Agricultural University · CNInstitute of Pomology · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31272134, 31672114National Natural Science Foundation of China 31460206National Natural Science Foundation of China 31600232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolyploidy and hybridization are ubiquitous in Rubus L., a large and taxonomically challenging genus. Chinese Rubus are mainly concentrated into two major sections, the diploid Idaeobatus and the polyploid Malachobatus. However, it remains unclear to be auto- or allo- polyploid origin of polyploids in Rubus. We investigated the homoeologs and the structure of the GBSSI-1 (granule-bound starch synthase I) gene in 140 Rubus individuals representing 102 taxa in 17 (out of the total 24) subsections of 7 (total of 12) sections at different ploidy levels.

resultsBased on the gene structure and sequence divergence, we defined three gene variants, GBSSI-1a, GBSSI-1b, and GBSSI-1c. When compared with GBSSI-1a, both GBSSI-1b and GBSSI-1c have a shorter fourth intron, and GBSSI-1c had an additional deletion in the fifth intron. For diploids, either GBSSI-1a or GBSSI-1b was detected in 56 taxa consisting of 82 individuals from sect. Idaeobatus, while both alleles existed in R. pentagonus and R. peltatus. Both homoeologs GBSSI-1a and GBSSI-1b were identified in 39 taxa (48 individuals) of Malachobatus polyploids. They were also observed in two sect. Dalibardastrum taxa, in one sect. Chamaebatus taxon, and in three taxa from sect. Cylactis. Interestingly, all three homoeologs were observed in the three tetraploid taxa. Phylogenetic trees and networks suggested two clades (I and II), corresponding to GBSSI-1a, and GBSSI-1b/1c sequences, respectively. GBSSI-1 homoeologs from the same polyploid individual were resolved in different well-supported clades, and some of these homoelogs were more closely related to homoelogs in other species than they were to each other. This implied that the homoeologs of these polyploids were donated by different ancestral taxa, indicating their allopolyploid origin. Two kinds of diploids hybridized to form most allotetraploid species. The early-divergent diploid species with GBSSI-1a or -1b emerged before polyploid formation in the evolutionary history of Rubus.

conclusionThis study provided new insights into allopolyploid origin and evolution from diploid to polyploid within the genus Rubus at the molecular phylogenetic level, consistent with the taxonomic treatment by Yü et al. and Lu.

Indexed as

Cell NucleusDiploidyEvolution, MolecularHybridization, GeneticPhylogenyPolyploidyRubusStarch SynthaseTetraploidygranule-bound starch synthase IStarch SynthaseAllopolyploid originEvolutionGBSSI-1HybridizationRubusSection IdaeobatusSect. Malachobatus

Identifiers

PMID31291892
PMCPMC6617891
OpenAlexW2993010673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.