ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019
Monarch butterfly trends are sensitive to unexamined changes in museum collections over time.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phenological mismatch is less important than total nectar availability for checkerspot butterflies.Ecology · 2024Article
- Using community science to map western monarch butterflies (Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Environmental and economic concerns surrounding restrictions on glyphosate use in corn.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Glyphosate inhibits melanization and increases susceptibility to infection in insects.PLoS biology · 2021Article
- Plant adaptation to climate change - Where are we?Journal of systematics and evolution · 2020Article
- Applying machine learning to investigate long-term insect-plant interactions preserved on digitized herbarium specimens.Applications in plant sciences · 2020Article
- The Global Museum: natural history collections and the future of evolutionary science and public education.PeerJ · 2020Article
- Tracking trends in monarch abundance over the 20th century is currently impossible using museum records.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
- Reply to Wepprich and Ries et al.: Alternative methods do not provide support for the contribution of GM crops to monarch declines.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.