ArticleJournal of applied microbiology2019
Detection of Campylobacter spp. in water by dead-end ultrafiltration and application at farm level.
Article in Journal of applied microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of cleaning and disinfection procedures on poultry farms.Poultry science · 2025Article
- Campylobacteriosis: A rising threat in foodborne illnesses.Open veterinary journal · 2024Review
- Campylobacter jejuni: targeting host cells, adhesion, invasion, and survival.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2023Review
- The Persistence of Bacterial Pathogens in Surface Water and Its Impact on Global Food Safety.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Genomic analysis of high copy-number sequences for the targeted detection of Listeria species using a flow-through surveillance system.Archives of microbiology · 2021Article
- A Rapid Culture Method for the Detection ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Application of Lab-on-Chip for Detection of Microbial Nucleic Acid in Food and Environment.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Review
- Identification of Transmission Routes ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsThe purposes were to evaluate the detection of low levels of Campylobacter in water by dead-end ultrafiltration (DEUF) to determine the sensitivity and suitability for use under field condition. METHODS AND
resultsThe DEUF technique followed by detection according to ISO 10272 was tested on artificially and naturally contaminated water. Campylobacter were detected in all samples spiked with more than 10 CFU 60 l
conclusionsThe results indicate that DEUF is useful for detection of low numbers of Campylobacter in large volumes of water. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Contaminated water is an important source for transmission of Campylobacter to broilers and humans. The concentration of Campylobacter is usually low with a high level of background microbiota. This study shows the advantages of DEUF both in the laboratory and under field conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.