Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31291292›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Differential patterns of disease and injury in Mozambique: New perspectives from a pragmatic, multicenter, surveillance study of 7809 emergency presentations.

Ana O Mocumbi, Bonifácio Cebola, Artur Muloliwa, Frederico Sebastião, Samuel J Sitefane, Naisa Manafe, Igor Dobe, Norberto Lumbandali, Ashley Keates, Nerolie Stickland and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana O MocumbiInstituto Nacional de Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique.ORCID 0000-0002-9564-2860
Bonifácio CebolaHospital Central da Beira, Beira, Mozambique.
Artur MuloliwaDirecção Provincial de Sofala, Beira, Mozambique.
Frederico SebastiãoHospital Central de Nampula, Nampula, Mozambique.
Samuel J SitefaneHospital Geral de Mavalane, Maputo, Mozambique.
Naisa ManafeInstituto Nacional de Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique.
Igor DobeInstituto Nacional de Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique.
Norberto LumbandaliInstituto Nacional de Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique.
Ashley KeatesAustralian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
Nerolie SticklandAustralian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
Yih-Kai ChanAustralian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
Simon StewartUniversidade Eduardo Mondlane, Maputo, Mozambique.
Australian Catholic University · AUInstituto Nacional de Saúde · MZEduardo Mondlane University · MZMaputo Central Hospital · MZInstituto Superior Politécnico de Manica · MZNational Directorate of Geology · MZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a paucity of primary data to understand the overall pattern of disease and injuries as well as related health-service utilization in resource-poor countries in Africa.

objectiveTo generate reliable and robust data describing the pattern of emergency presentations attributable to communicable disease (CD), non-communicable disease (NCD) and injuries in three different regions of Mozambique.

methodsWe undertook a pragmatic, prospective, multicentre surveillance study of individuals (all ages) presenting to the emergency departments of three hospitals in Southern (Maputo), Central (Beira) and Northern (Nampula) Mozambique. During 24-hour surveillance in the seasonally distinct months of April and October 2016/2017, we recorded data on 7,809 participants randomly selected from 39,124 emergency presentations to the three participating hospitals. Applying a pragmatic surveillance protocol, data were prospectively collected on the demography, clinical history, medical profile and treatment of study participants.

findingsA total of 4,021 males and 3,788 (48.5%) females comprising 630 infants (8.1%), 2,070 children (26.5%), 1,009 adolescents (12.9%) and, 4,100 adults (52.5%) were studied. CD was the most common presentation (3,914 cases/50.1%) followed by NCD (1,963/25.1%) and injuries (1,932/24.7%). On an adjusted basis, CD was more prevalent in younger individuals (17.9±17.7 versus 26.6±19.2 years;p<0.001), females (51.7% versus 48.7%-OR 1.137, 95%CI 1.036-1.247;p = 0.007), the capital city of Maputo (59.6%) versus the more remote cities of Beira (42.8%-OR 0.532, 95%CI 0.476-0.594) and Nampula (45.8%-OR 0.538, 95%CI 0.480-0.603) and, during April (51.1% versus 49.3% for October-OR 1.142, 95%CI 1.041-1.253;p = 0.005). Conversely, NCD was progressively more prevalent in older individuals, females and in the regional city of Beira, whilst injuries were more prevalent in males (particularly adolescent/young men) and the northern city of Nampula. On a 24-hour basis, presentation patterns were unique to each hospital.

interpretationApplying highly pragmatic surveillance methods suited to the low-resource setting of Mozambique, these unique data provide critical insights into the differential pattern of CD, NCD and injury. Consequently, they highlight specific health priorities across different regions and seasons in Southern Africa.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolCommunicable DiseasesFemaleHumansInfantMalariaMaleMozambiqueNoncommunicable DiseasesPopulation Surveillance

Identifiers

PMID31291292
PMCPMC6619685
OpenAlexW2959008206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.