Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31291011›Full record

ArticleCancer2019

Practices and perceptions regarding intravenous opioid infusion and cancer pain management.

Joseph A Arthur, Akhila Reddy, Uniqua Smith, David Hui, Minjeong Park, Diane Liu, Nicole Vaughan-Adams, Ali Haider, Janet Williams, Eduardo Bruera

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joseph A ArthurDepartment of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-9185-6108
Akhila ReddyDepartment of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-7628-8675
Uniqua SmithDepartment of Nursing, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, Texas.
David HuiDepartment of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0003-2733-6607
Minjeong ParkDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, Texas.
Diane LiuDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, Texas.
Nicole Vaughan-AdamsDepartment of Nursing, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, Texas.
Ali HaiderDepartment of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0003-3323-8595
Janet WilliamsDepartment of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, Texas.
Eduardo BrueraDepartment of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-8745-0412
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Kathrin Milbury · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NIH HHS CA16672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn view of the recent opioid crisis, ways to promote safe and effective opioid-related practices are needed. Faster intravenous (iv) opioid infusion rates can result in increased adverse effects and risk for nonmedical opioid use. Data on best practices regarding safe iv opioid administration for cancer pain are limited. This study examined iv opioid bolus infusion practices and perceptions about opioids in cancer pain among 4 groups of inpatient oncology nurses.

methodsAn anonymous cross-sectional survey was conducted among oncology nurses working in medical, surgical, intensive care unit (ICU), and emergency department (ED) settings. An iv opioid bolus infusion speed less than 120 seconds was considered too fast.

resultsThe participant response rate was 59% (731 of 1234). Approximately 58%, 54%, and 58% of all nurses administered morphine, hydromorphone, and fentanyl, respectively, in less than 120 seconds. The median morphine infusion speeds were 55, 60, 60, and 85 seconds for ICU, surgical, ED, and medical unit nurses, respectively (P = .0002). The odds ratios for infusing too fast were 2.04 and 2.52 for ED (P = .039) and ICU nurses (P = .003), respectively, in comparison with medical unit nurses, and they were 0.27 and 0.18 with frequent (P = .003) and very frequent use of a timing device (P = .0001), respectively, in comparison with no use.

conclusionsMore than half the nurses working in the inpatient setting reported administering iv opioids too fast. ICU nurses administered opioids the fastest. Nurses who frequently used a timing device were less likely to infuse too fast. Further research is needed to standardize and improve the safe intermittent administration of iv opioids to patients with cancer.

Indexed as

Surveys and QuestionnairesAdultAnalgesics, OpioidCancer PainClinical CompetenceCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFentanylHumansHydromorphoneInfusions, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedMorphineNeoplasmsNursesAnalgesics, OpioidFentanylHydromorphoneMorphinecancer painnurse practicesopioid infusion

Identifiers

PMID31291011
PMCPMC11186036
OpenAlexW2958124834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.