ArticleThe plant genome2019
Genomic Prediction of Pumpkin Hybrid Performance.
Article in The plant genome, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- 2NPLGBM: a genomic model that merges the strengths of classical and machine learning methods in genomic prediction.Plant methods · 2026Article
- Optimising parent selection in plant breeding: comparing metaheuristic algorithms for genotype building.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Article
- Optimizing training sets to identify superior genotypes in hybrid populations.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Hybrid Prediction in Horticulture Crop Breeding: Progress and Challenges.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Genomic selection for crop improvement in fruits and vegetables: a systematic scoping review.Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2024Article
- A statistical package for evaluation of hybrid performance in plant breeding via genomic selection.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- CuGenDBv2: an updated database for cucurbit genomics.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Characterization of the USDAFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Selection of parental lines for plant breedingFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Prediction of heterosis in the recent rapeseed (Brassica napus) polyploid by pairing parental nucleotide sequences.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
- Genomic Prediction and the Practical Breeding of 12 Quantitative-Inherited Traits in Cucumber (Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Genomic Prediction and Selection for Fruit Traits in Winter Squash.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomic prediction has become an increasingly popular tool for hybrid performance evaluation in plant breeding mainly because that it can reduce cost and accelerate a breeding program. In this study, we propose a systematic procedure to predict hybrid performance using a genomic selection (GS) model that takes both additive and dominance marker effects into account. We first demonstrate the advantage of the additive-dominance effects model over the only additive effects model through a simulation study. Based on the additive-dominance model, we predict genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) for individual hybrid combinations and their parental lines. The GEBV-based specific combining ability (SCA) for each hybrid and general combining ability (GCA) for its parental lines are then derived to quantify the degree of midparent heterosis (MPH) or better-parent heterosis (BPH) of the hybrid. Finally, we estimate the variance components resulting from additive and dominance gene action effects and heritability using a genomic best linear unbiased predictor (g-BLUP) model. These estimates are used to justify the results of the genomic prediction study. A pumpkin ( spp.) data set is given to illustrate the provided procedure. The data set consists of 320 parental lines with 61,179 collected single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers; 119, 120, and 120 phenotypic values of hybrids on three quantitative traits within maxima Duchesne; and 89, 111, and 90 phenotypic values of hybrids on the same three quantitative traits within Dechesne.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.