Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31290920›Full record

ArticleThe plant genome2019

Genomic Prediction of Pumpkin Hybrid Performance.

Po-Ya Wu, Chih-Wei Tung, Chieh-Ying Lee, Chen-Tuo Liao

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The plant genome, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Optimising parent selection in plant breeding: comparing metaheuristic algorithms for genotype building.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Genomic selection for crop improvement in fruits and vegetables: a systematic scoping review.Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Characterization of the USDAFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  9. Selection of parental lines for plant breedingFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Po-Ya Wu
Chih-Wei Tung
Chieh-Ying Lee
Chen-Tuo Liao

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic prediction has become an increasingly popular tool for hybrid performance evaluation in plant breeding mainly because that it can reduce cost and accelerate a breeding program. In this study, we propose a systematic procedure to predict hybrid performance using a genomic selection (GS) model that takes both additive and dominance marker effects into account. We first demonstrate the advantage of the additive-dominance effects model over the only additive effects model through a simulation study. Based on the additive-dominance model, we predict genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) for individual hybrid combinations and their parental lines. The GEBV-based specific combining ability (SCA) for each hybrid and general combining ability (GCA) for its parental lines are then derived to quantify the degree of midparent heterosis (MPH) or better-parent heterosis (BPH) of the hybrid. Finally, we estimate the variance components resulting from additive and dominance gene action effects and heritability using a genomic best linear unbiased predictor (g-BLUP) model. These estimates are used to justify the results of the genomic prediction study. A pumpkin ( spp.) data set is given to illustrate the provided procedure. The data set consists of 320 parental lines with 61,179 collected single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers; 119, 120, and 120 phenotypic values of hybrids on three quantitative traits within maxima Duchesne; and 89, 111, and 90 phenotypic values of hybrids on the same three quantitative traits within Dechesne.

Indexed as

Hybridization, GeneticPlant BreedingBayes TheoremComputer SimulationCucurbitaDatasets as TopicGenetic VariationInheritance PatternsModels, GeneticModels, StatisticalSelection, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID31290920
PMCPMC12810009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.