Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31290403›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2019

Mothers' Perceptions of the Internet and Social Media as Sources of Parenting and Health Information: Qualitative Study.

Rachel Y Moon, Anita Mathews, Rosalind Oden, Rebecca Carlin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trust in expert versus lay comments in online articles about spanking and car seat safety.Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43) · 2021
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A Compassion-Focused Approach to Support Parents After Preterm Birth.Clinical child and family psychology review · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rachel Y MoonUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0186-8138
Anita MathewsChildren's National Health System, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4311-6041
Rosalind OdenChildren's National Health System, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4592-7614
Rebecca CarlinChildren's National Health System, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5489-9766

Funding

The Influence of Social Networks on Disparities in Postneonatal Infant MortalityR01MD007702 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI COLSON, EVE R, MOON, RACHEL Y · 2014 to 2025
$5.4M
NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD007702
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditionally, guidance and support to new parents have come from family, friends, and health care providers. However, the internet and social media are growing sources of guidance and support for parents. Little is known about how the internet and social media are used by parents of young infants and specifically about parental perceptions of the internet and social media as sources of parenting and infant health information.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to explore, using qualitative methods, parental perceptions of the advantages and disadvantages of the internet and social media as sources of parenting and health information regarding their infant.

methodsA total of 28 mothers participated in focus groups or individual interviews. Probing questions concerning parenting and health information sources were asked. Themes were developed in an iterative manner from coded data.

resultsThe central themes were (1) reasons that mothers turn to the internet for parenting and health information, (2) cautionary advice about the internet, and (3) reasons that mothers turn to social media for parenting and health information. Mothers appreciated the ability to gather unlimited information and multiple opinions quickly and anonymously, but recognized the need to use reputable sources of information. Mothers also appreciated the immediacy of affirmation, support, and tailored information available through social media.

conclusionsThe internet and social media are rapidly becoming important and trusted sources of parenting and health information that mothers turn to when making infant care decisions.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Information ExchangeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInternetMaleMothersParentingQualitative ResearchSocial MediaYoung Adultfocus groupsinternetparentingsocial media

Identifiers

PMID31290403
PMCPMC6647756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.