ArticleCancer medicine2019
Prognostic impact of extratumoral perineural invasion in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Impact of Histopathological Features on the Prognosis of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Design of a Predictive Recurrence Scoring System in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Rethinking Radiation Therapy for Perineural Invasion in Oral Cancer: Does More Coverage Improve Outcomes?Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- Understanding the role of nerves in head and neck cancers - a review.Oncology reviews · 2024Review
- Perineural Invasion Is a Significant Prognostic Factor in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Perineural invasion and perineural spread in periocular squamous cell carcinoma.Eye (London, England) · 2023Review
- The GAL/GALR2 axis promotes the perineural invasion of salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma via epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Review
- Epigenetic Regulations of Perineural Invasion in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
- Review
- Review
- Article
- Prognostic impact of extratumoral perineural invasion in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.Cancer medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposePerineural invasion (PNI) is an adverse prognostic factor in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC). The American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual, eighth edition, introduced a subdivision of PNI into two distinct forms, that is, extratumoral and intratumoral PNI (EPNI and IPNI, respectively). We designed the current study to assess whether EPNI and IPNI have different prognostic implications in terms of disease control and survival outcomes in patients with OCSCC. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively examined 229 consecutive patients with OCSCC and PNI who underwent radical surgery between July 2003 and November 2016. EPNI and IPNI were identified in 76 and 153 patients, respectively. The 5-year locoregional control (LRC), distant metastasis, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) rates served as the main outcome measures.
resultsCompared with patients showing IPNI, those with EPNI had a higher prevalence of worst pattern of invasion type-5 (P < 0.001), alcohol consumption (P = 0.03), and close margins (P = 0.002). Univariate analysis revealed that EPNI was a significant predictor of 5-year LRC (P = 0.024), DFS (P = 0.007), and OS (P = 0.034) rates. After allowance for potential confounders in multivariable analysis, ENPI was retained in the model as an independent predictor of 5-year LRC (P = 0.028), DFS (P = 0.011), and OS (P = 0.034) rates.
conclusionCompared with IPNI, the presence of EPNI in OCSCC portends less favorable outcomes. Patients with EPNI are potential candidates for definite aggressive treatment modalities aimed at improving prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.