Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31290167›Full record

SynthesisVeterinary surgery : VS2020

A systematic review of criteria used to report complications in soft tissue and oncologic surgical clinical research studies in dogs and cats.

Christelle M Follette, Michelle A Giuffrida, Ingrid M Balsa, William T N Culp, Philipp D Mayhew, Michelle L Oblak, Ameet Singh, Michele A Steffey

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Veterinary surgery : VS, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Evaluation of complications and long-term outcomes in dogs with surgically treated urethral prolapse.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Menrath ulcers in cats: four cases (2014-2023).The Journal of small animal practice · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Staphylectomy in nonbrachycephalic dogs: A retrospective study of 27 cases.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Christelle M FolletteDepartment of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, California.
Michelle A GiuffridaDepartment of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, California.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6862-2653
Ingrid M BalsaDepartment of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, California.
William T N CulpDepartment of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, California.
Philipp D MayhewDepartment of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, California.
Michelle L OblakDepartment of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8489-4643
Ameet SinghDepartment of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Michele A SteffeyDepartment of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, California.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0852-0644
University of California, Davis · USUniversity of Guelph · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate reporting of surgical complications and other adverse events in clinical research articles describing soft tissue and oncologic surgery in dogs and cats. STUDY

designSystematic literature review. SAMPLE: English-language articles describing soft tissue and oncologic surgeries in client-owned dogs and cats published in peer-reviewed journals from 2013 to 2016.

methodsCAB, AGRICOLA, and MEDLINE databases were searched for eligible articles. Article characteristics relevant to complications were abstracted and summarized, including reported events, definitions, criteria used to classify events according to severity and time frame, and relevant citations.

resultsOne hundred fifty-one articles involving 10 522 animals were included. Canine retrospective case series of dogs predominated. Ninety-two percent of articles mentioned complications in study results, but only 7.3% defined the term complication. Articles commonly described complications according to time frame and severity, but terminology and classification criteria were highly variable, conflicting between studies, or not provided. Most (58%) reported complications could have been graded with a published veterinary adverse event classification scheme, although common intraoperative complications were notable exceptions.

conclusionDefinitions and criteria used to classify and report soft tissue and oncologic surgical complications are often absent, incomplete, or contradictory among studies. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Lack of consistent terminology contributes to inadequate communication of important information about surgical complications. Standardization of terminology and consistency in severity scoring will improve comparative evaluation of clinical research results.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsAnimalsCat DiseasesCatsDog DiseasesDogsNeoplasmsPostoperative ComplicationsResearch DesignRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID31290167
PMCPMC6973234
OpenAlexW2958220332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.