ArticleMolecular biology reports2019
Decreasing the immunogenicity of Erwinia chrysanthemi asparaginase via protein engineering: computational approach.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- L-asparaginase: a review of microbial production and protein engineering with translational applications for oncology and food safety.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Review
- Epitope mapping strategies for immunogenicity mitigation in streptokinase therapeutics: an in-silico study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Optimizing Gene Sources for L-asparaginase Production: A Comparative Review.Current microbiology · 2025Review
- Desirable L-asparaginases for treating cancer and current research trends.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- Enzyme Engineering Strategies for the Bioenhancement of L-Asparaginase Used as a Biopharmaceutical.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2023Review
- Finding and engineering the newly found bacterial superoxide dismutase enzyme to increase its thermostability and decrease the immunogenicity: a computational and experimental research.Archives of microbiology · 2023Article
- Microbial L-asparaginase as a promising enzyme for treatment of various cancers.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins is one of the main challenges in disease treatment. L-Asparaginase is an important enzyme in cancer treatment which sometimes leads to undesirable side effects such as immunogenic or allergic responses. Here, to decrease Erwinase (Erwinia chrysanthemiL-Asparaginase) immunogenicity, which is the main drawback of the enzyme, firstly conformational B cell epitopes of Erwinase were predicted from three-dimensional structure by three different computational methods. A few residues were defined as candidates for reducing immunogenicity of the protein by point mutation. In addition to immunogenicity and hydrophobicity, stability and binding energy of mutants were also analyzed computationally. In order to evaluate the stability of the best mutant, molecular dynamics simulation was performed. Among mutants, H240A and Q239A presented significant reduction in immunogenicity. In contrast, the immunogenicity scores of D235A slightly decreased according to two servers. Binding affinity of substrate to the active site reduced significantly in K265A and E268A. The final results of molecular dynamics simulation indicated that H240A mutation has not changed the stability, flexibility, and the total structure of desired protein. Overall, point mutation can be used for reducing immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins, in this context, in silico approaches can be used to screen suitable mutants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.