Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31289975›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental geochemistry and health2020

Mining is bad for health: a voyage of discovery.

Alex G Stewart

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental geochemistry and health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05094076 (Effect of Phosphate Exposure on Workers Respiratory and Oral Health in Phosphate Mine at Safaga), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05094076 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Phosphate Exposure on Workers Respiratory and Oral Health in Phosphate Mine at Safaga

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled100ConditionsWork-related IllnessArmschest x ray
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 136 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Considering the Social and Economic Sustainability of AI.Science and engineering ethics · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Artisanal Gem Mining in Brazil: Evaluation of Oxidative Stress and Genotoxicity Biomarkers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Occupational Safety and Health of Women in Mining.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Mental health and mining: the Ghanaian gold mining story.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alex G StewartCollege of Life and Environmental Science, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4RJ, UK. dragonsteeth@doctors.org.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4931-5340
University of Exeter · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mining continues to be a dangerous activity, whether large-scale industrial mining or small-scale artisanal mining. Not only are there accidents, but exposure to dust and toxins, along with stress from the working environment or managerial pressures, give rise to a range of diseases that affect miners. I look at mining and health from various personal perspectives: that of the ordinary man (much of life depends on mined elements in the house, car and phone); as a member of the Society for Environmental Geochemistry and Health (environmental contamination and degradation leads to ill health in nearby communities); as a public health doctor (mining health is affected by many factors, usually acting in a mix, ranging from individual inheritance-genetic makeup, sex, age; personal choices-diet, lifestyle; living conditions-employment, war; social support-family, local community; environmental conditions-education, work; to national and international constraints-trade, economy, natural world); as a volunteer (mining health costs are not restricted to miners or industry but borne by everyone who partakes of mining benefits-all of us); and as a lay preacher (the current global economy concentrates on profit at the expense of the health of miners). Partnership working by academics with communities, government and industry should develop evidence-based solutions. Employment, health, economic stability and environmental protection need not be mutually exclusive. We all need to act.

Indexed as

MiningCoalDustEnvironmental PollutionFemaleHumansMaleMinersOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposureOccupational HealthPopulation HealthWorkplaceCoalDustDeterminants of diseaseEconomicsPneumoconiosisPreventionPsychological stressSocial support

Identifiers

PMID31289975
PMCPMC7225204
OpenAlexW2962523035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.