Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31289938›Full record

ReviewMikrochimica acta2019

A review on advances in methods for modification of paper supports for use in point-of-care testing.

Rui Hua Tang, Li Na Liu, Su Feng Zhang, Xiao Cong He, Xiu Jun Li, Feng Xu, Yong Hao Ni, Fei Li

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Mikrochimica acta, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Rui Hua TangCollege of Bioresources Chemical and Materials Engineering, Shaanxi University of Science & Technology, Xi'an, 710021, People's Republic of China.
Li Na LiuCollege of Bioresources Chemical and Materials Engineering, Shaanxi University of Science & Technology, Xi'an, 710021, People's Republic of China.
Su Feng ZhangKey laboratory of Paper Based Functional Materials of China National Light Industry, Shaanxi University of Science & Technology, Xi'an, 710021, People's Republic of China.
Xiao Cong HeThe Key Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, People's Republic of China.
Xiu Jun LiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Texas at El Paso, 500 West University Ave, El Paso, TX, 79968, USA.
Feng XuThe Key Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, People's Republic of China.
Yong Hao NiCollege of Bioresources Chemical and Materials Engineering, Shaanxi University of Science & Technology, Xi'an, 710021, People's Republic of China. yonghao@unb.ca.
Fei LiThe Key Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, People's Republic of China. feili@mail.xjtu.edu.cn.
Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNShaanxi University of Science and Technology · CNThe University of Texas at El Paso · USUniversity of New Brunswick · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paper is a widely used support for use in devices for point-of-care testing (POCT) in clinical diagnosis, food safety monitoring and environmental pollution. Paper is inexpensive, biocompatible, biodegradable and allows a sample fluid to flow by capillary force. Numerous method have been developed recently for chemical modification of papers in order to introduce different functionalities. This review (with 148 refs.) summarizes the recent progress in paper-based POCT devices. The introduction summarizes the state of the art of paper-based POCT devices and the physicochemical properties of existing unmodified materials (including cellulose, cellulose-based composites, cotton fibers, glass fibers, nitrocellulose, thread). Methods for paper modification for sample pretreatment are summarized next, with subsections on sample storage and collection, sample separation, nucleic acid extraction and sample preconcentration. Another main section covers approaches for paper modification for improving POCTs, with subsections on assays for proteins, nucleic acids, drugs, ion and organic molecules. The advantages and disadvantages of these approaches are compared. Several tables are presented that summarize the various modification techniques. A concluding section summarizes the current status, addresses challenges and gives an outlook on future perspectives of POCTs. Graphical abstract This review summarizes the progress that has been made in paper based point-of-care testing (POCT) and lateral flow assays (LFAs), quite often by using advanced nanomaterials for paper modification.

Indexed as

Lateral flow assaysNanolabelsNanomaterialsPaper-based POCT deviceSample pretreatment

Identifiers

PMID31289938
OpenAlexW2957222236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.