ArticleGigaScience2019
Toxins from scratch? Diverse, multimodal gene origins in the predatory robber fly Dasypogon diadema indicate a dynamic venom evolution in dipteran insects.
Article in GigaScience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genome of venomous caterpillarProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Phylogenomic Analysis and Functional Characterization of the APETALA2/Ethylene-Responsive Factor Transcription Factor Across Solanaceae.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Divergent venom effectors correlate with ecological niche in neuropteran predators.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Diversely evolved xibalbin variants from remipede venom inhibit potassium channels and activate PKA-II and Erk1/2 signaling.BMC biology · 2024Article
- The venom and telopodal defence systems of the centipede Lithobius forficatus are functionally convergent serial homologues.BMC biology · 2024Article
- The genome of the ant Tetramorium bicarinatum reveals a tandem organization of venom peptides genes allowing the prediction of their regulatory and evolutionary profiles.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- ToxCodAn-Genome: an automated pipeline for toxin-gene annotation in genome assembly of venomous lineages.GigaScience · 2024Article
- Combined Transcriptome and Proteome Analysis of the Protein Composition of the Brochosomes of the LeafhopperInsects · 2023Article
- Horizontal gene transfer underlies the painful stings of asp caterpillars (Lepidoptera: Megalopygidae).Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Modern venomics-Current insights, novel methods, and future perspectives in biological and applied animal venom research.GigaScience · 2022Article
- The Natterin Proteins Diversity: A Review on Phylogeny, Structure, and Immune Function.Toxins · 2021Review
- Production, composition, and mode of action of the painful defensive venom produced by a limacodid caterpillar,Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Review
- Pick Your Poison: Molecular Evolution of Venom Proteins in Asilidae (Insecta: Diptera).Toxins · 2020Article
- Toxin-like neuropeptides in the sea anemoneProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- An Economic Dilemma Between Molecular Weapon Systems May Explain an Arachno-atypical Venom in Wasp Spiders (Biomolecules · 2020Article
- Toxins from scratch? Diverse, multimodal gene origins in the predatory robber fly Dasypogon diadema indicate a dynamic venom evolution in dipteran insects.GigaScience · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVenoms and the toxins they contain represent molecular adaptations that have evolved on numerous occasions throughout the animal kingdom. However, the processes that shape venom protein evolution are poorly understood because of the scarcity of whole-genome data available for comparative analyses of venomous species.
resultsWe performed a broad comparative toxicogenomic analysis to gain insight into the genomic mechanisms of venom evolution in robber flies (Asilidae). We first sequenced a high-quality draft genome of the hymenopteran hunting robber fly Dasypogon diadema, analysed its venom by a combined proteotranscriptomic approach, and compared our results with recently described robber fly venoms to assess the general composition and major components of asilid venom. We then applied a comparative genomics approach, based on 1 additional asilid genome, 10 high-quality dipteran genomes, and 2 lepidopteran outgroup genomes, to reveal the evolutionary mechanisms and origins of identified venom proteins in robber flies.
conclusionsWhile homologues were identified for 15 of 30 predominant venom protein in the non-asilid genomes, the remaining 15 highly expressed venom proteins appear to be unique to robber flies. Our results reveal that the venom of D. diadema likely evolves in a multimodal fashion comprising (i) neofunctionalization after gene duplication, (ii) expression-dependent co-option of proteins, and (iii) asilid lineage-specific orphan genes with enigmatic origin. The role of such orphan genes is currently being disputed in evolutionary genomics but has not been discussed in the context of toxin evolution. Our results display an unexpected dynamic venom evolution in asilid insects, which contrasts the findings of the only other insect toxicogenomic evolutionary analysis, in parasitoid wasps (Hymenoptera), where toxin evolution is dominated by single gene co-option. These findings underpin the significance of further genomic studies to cover more neglected lineages of venomous taxa and to understand the importance of orphan genes as possible drivers for venom evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.