Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31289829›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2019

Conjugation of Different Immunogenic Enterococcal Vaccine Target Antigens Leads to Extended Strain Coverage.

F Romero-Saavedra, D Laverde, E Kalfopoulou, C Martini, R Torelli, D Martinez-Matamoros, M Sanguinetti, J Huebner

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Insights into ecology, pathogenesis, and biofilm formation ofMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Enterococcal Membrane Vesicles as Vaccine Candidates.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Vancomycin Resistance inMicroorganisms · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

F Romero-SaavedraDivision of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, Ludwig Maximillian's University, Munich, Germany.
D LaverdeDivision of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, Ludwig Maximillian's University, Munich, Germany.
E KalfopoulouDivision of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, Ludwig Maximillian's University, Munich, Germany.
C MartiniIstituto di Microbiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
R TorelliDipartimento di Scienze di Laboratorio e Infettivologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
D Martinez-MatamorosDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences and Center for Advanced Scientific Research (CICA), Universidade da Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
M SanguinettiIstituto di Microbiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
J HuebnerDivision of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, Ludwig Maximillian's University, Munich, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITUniversidade da Coruña · ESUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enterococci have emerged as important nosocomial pathogens due to their resistance to the most commonly used antibiotics. Alternative treatments or prevention options are aimed at polysaccharides and surface-related proteins that play important roles in pathogenesis. Previously, we have shown that 2 Enterococcus faecium proteins, the secreted antigen A and the peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase, as well as the Enterococcus faecalis polysaccharide diheteroglycan, are able to induce opsonic and cross-protective antibodies. Here, we evaluate the use of glycoconjugates consisting of these proteins and an enterococcal polysaccharide to develop a vaccine with broader strain coverage. Diheteroglycan was conjugated to these 2 enterococcal proteins. Rabbit sera raised against these glycoconjugates showed Immunoglobulin G titers against the corresponding conjugate, as well as against the respective protein and carbohydrate antigens. Effective opsonophagocytic killing for the 2 sera was observed against different E. faecalis and E. faecium strains. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays against whole bacterial cells showed immune recognition of 22 enterococcal strains by the sera. Moreover, the sera conferred protection against E. faecalis and E. faecium strains in a mouse infection model. Our results suggest that these glycoconjugates are promising candidates for vaccine formulations with a broader coverage against these nosocomial pathogens and that the evaluated proteins are potential carrier proteins.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialBacterial ProteinsBacterial VaccinesBlood Bactericidal ActivityDisease Models, AnimalEnterococcus faecalisEnterococcus faeciumGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsImmunity, HeterologousImmunoglobulin GMaleMice, Inbred BALB CMicrobial ViabilityOpsonin ProteinsAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialBacterial ProteinsBacterial VaccinesImmunoglobulin GOpsonin ProteinsPolysaccharides, BacterialVaccines, ConjugateVaccines, Subunitcapsular polysaccharidecarrier proteindiheteroglycanenterococcal proteinsEnterococcus faecalisEnterococcus faeciumglycoconjugatemouse infection modelopsonophagocytic assayVaccine

Identifiers

PMID31289829
PMCPMC6782101
OpenAlexW2957488423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.