Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31289743›Full record

ArticleSSM - population health2019

Service usage by a New Zealand Housing First cohort prior to being housed.

Nevil Pierse, Jenny Ombler, Maddie White, Clare Aspinall, Carole McMinn, Polly Atatoa-Carr, Julie Nelson, Kerry Hawkes, Brodie Fraser, Hera Cook and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SSM - population health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. From Mental Health Industry to Humane Care. Suggestions for an Alternative Systemic Approach to Distress.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nevil PierseHe Kainga Oranga/Housing and Health Research Group, University of Otago Wellington, New Zealand.
Jenny OmblerHe Kainga Oranga/Housing and Health Research Group, University of Otago Wellington, New Zealand.
Maddie WhiteHe Kainga Oranga/Housing and Health Research Group, University of Otago Wellington, New Zealand.
Clare AspinallHe Kainga Oranga/Housing and Health Research Group, University of Otago Wellington, New Zealand.
Carole McMinnThe People's Project, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Polly Atatoa-CarrNational Institute for Demographic and Economic Analysis, University of Waikato, New Zealand.
Julie NelsonThe People's Project, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Kerry HawkesThe People's Project, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Brodie FraserHe Kainga Oranga/Housing and Health Research Group, University of Otago Wellington, New Zealand.
Hera CookHe Kainga Oranga/Housing and Health Research Group, University of Otago Wellington, New Zealand.
Philippa Howden-ChapmanHe Kainga Oranga/Housing and Health Research Group, University of Otago Wellington, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Ending Homelessness in New Zealand: Housing First research programme is evaluating outcomes for people housed in a Housing First programme run by The People's Project in Hamilton, New Zealand. This baseline results paper uses administrative data to look at the scope and duration of their interactions with government services.

methodsWe linked our de-identified cohort to the Integrated Data Infrastructure (IDI). This database contains administrative data on most services provided by the New Zealand Government to citizens. Linkage rates in all datasets were above 90%. This paper reports on the use of government services by the cohort before being housed. We focus on the domains of health, justice and income support.

resultsThe cohort of 390 people had over 200,000 recorded interactions across a range of services in their lifetime. The most common services were health, justice and welfare. The homeless cohort had used the services at rates far in excess of the general population. Unfortunately these did not prevent them from becoming homeless.

conclusionThese preliminary findings show the homeless population have important service delivery needs and a very high level of interaction with government services. This highlights the importance of analysing the contributing factors towards homelessness; for evaluation of interventions such as Housing First, and for understanding the need for integrated systems of government policy and practice to prevent homelessness. This paper also provides the baseline for post-Housing First evaluations.

Indexed as

HomelessnessHousing firstLinked dataNew ZealandService usage

Identifiers

PMID31289743
PMCPMC6593313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.