Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31289703›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2019

Determination of the evolutionary pressure on

Wan Zhang, Yunlin Zhao, Guiyan Yang, Jiao Peng, Shuwen Chen, Zhenggang Xu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Whole-genome sequencing of aMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Unveiling the Molecular Mechanisms of Browning inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. DistinguishOpen life sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Quality Evaluation of the Oil ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  12. Genome Survey and SSR Analysis ofGenetics research · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Assessment of genetic diversity inBreeding science · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wan ZhangHunan Research Center of Engineering Technology for Utilization of Environmental and Resources Plant, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Yunlin ZhaoHunan Research Center of Engineering Technology for Utilization of Environmental and Resources Plant, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Guiyan YangHunan Research Center of Engineering Technology for Utilization of Environmental and Resources Plant, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Jiao PengHunan Research Center of Engineering Technology for Utilization of Environmental and Resources Plant, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Shuwen ChenCollege of Forestry, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, China.
Zhenggang XuHunan Research Center of Engineering Technology for Utilization of Environmental and Resources Plant, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Central South University · CNCentral South University of Forestry and Technology · CNNorthwest A&F University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Camellia oleiferaChloroplast genomeCodon usageEvolution pressureIsland plantRepeat analysisSSR

Identifiers

PMID31289703
PMCPMC6599451
OpenAlexW2955884864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.