ArticleEvolution letters2019
Genomic selection on breeding time in a wild bird population.
Article in Evolution letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Flexible Method for Genomics-Based Quantitative Genetics in Wild Study Systems-A Case Study on a House Sparrow Meta-Population.Evolutionary applications · 2026Article
- Genetic and epigenetic differentiation in response to genomic selection for avian lay date.Evolutionary applications · 2024Article
- The estimation of additive genetic variance of body size in a wild passerine is sensitive to the method used to estimate relatedness among the individuals.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- The genomics of adaptation to climate in European great tit (Evolution letters · 2024Article
- Expanding the application of haplotype-based genomic predictions to the wild: A case of antibody response against Teladorsagia circumcincta in Soay sheep.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Genotypes selected for early and late avian lay date differ in their phenotype, but not fitness, in the wild.Science advances · 2023Article
- A polygenic basis for birth weight in a wild population of red deer (Cervus elaphus).G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Article
- Taking quantitative genomics into the wild.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Using genomic prediction to detect microevolutionary change of a quantitative trait.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Performance of methods to detect genetic variants from bisulphite sequencing data in a non-model species.Molecular ecology resources · 2022Article
- The utility of genomic prediction models in evolutionary genetics.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021Article
- Rapid changes in DNA methylation associated with the initiation of reproduction in a small songbird.Molecular ecology · 2021Article
- Correlational selection in the age of genomics.Nature ecology & evolution · 2021Review
- What processes must we understand to forecast regional-scale population dynamics?Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2020Article
- Genomics of sex allocation in the parasitoid wasp Nasonia vitripennis.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- Evolutionary genomics can improve prediction of species' responses to climate change.Evolution letters · 2020Article
- Exploration of tissue-specific gene expression patterns underlying timing of breeding in contrasting temperature environments in a song bird.BMC genomics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial selection experiments are a powerful tool in evolutionary biology. Selecting individuals based on multimarker genotypes (genomic selection) has several advantages over phenotype-based selection but has, so far, seen very limited use outside animal and plant breeding. Genomic selection depends on the markers tagging the causal loci that underlie the selected trait. Because the number of necessary markers depends, among other factors, on effective population size, genomic selection may be in practice not feasible in wild populations as most wild populations have much higher effective population sizes than domesticated populations. However, the current possibilities of cost-effective high-throughput genotyping could overcome this limitation and thereby make it possible to apply genomic selection also in wild populations. Using a unique dataset of about 2000 wild great tits (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.