Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31289673›Full record

ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2019

Proton beam therapy for renal pelvis and ureter cancer: A report of 5 cases and a literature review.

Takashi Iizumi, Hitoshi Ishikawa, Yuta Sekino, Kayoko Ohnishi, Masashi Mizumoto, Tetsuo Nonaka, Hideyuki Sakurai

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takashi IizumiDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Faculty of Medicine, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8576, Japan.
Hitoshi IshikawaDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Faculty of Medicine, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8576, Japan.
Yuta SekinoDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Faculty of Medicine, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8576, Japan.
Kayoko OhnishiDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Faculty of Medicine, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8576, Japan.
Masashi MizumotoDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Faculty of Medicine, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8576, Japan.
Tetsuo NonakaDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Faculty of Medicine, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8576, Japan.
Hideyuki SakuraiDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Faculty of Medicine, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8576, Japan.
University of Tsukuba · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Standard treatment for localized renal pelvis and ureter cancer is surgery. Previously, the primary role of radiation therapy (RT) in cancer treatment was to control pain and hemostasis as palliative or as adjuvant therapy following surgery. In this report, we describe 5 patients with the disease treated with proton beam therapy (PBT) as curative treatment. Between September 2009 and July 2013, 5 males with renal pelvis (n=3) or ureter (n=2) cancer were treated by PBT with hypofractionated [72.6 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE)/22 fractions] or conventional [64-66 Gy (RBE)/32-33 fractions] fractionation. The median patient age was 72 years (range, 59-85 years). Three patients were deemed unfit for surgery. Local hypofractionated PBT was performed in 2 patients with T1-2N0M0 diseases, while prophylactic lymph node irradiation using a patch irradiation technique was performed for the remaining 3 patients, who had T3-4 disease. Two patients with T3-4 disease received chemotherapy prior to definitive PBT. No serious acute or late toxicities were observed in any patient. Local tumor control was achieved in 3 patients (60%); however, distant metastases were observed in 2 patients. Four of the five patients (80%) evaluated in the present study survived for >3 years. The data is limited; however, PBT appears to be a potential option for patients with renal pelvis or ureter cancer, especially for those who are unsuitable for radical surgery.

Indexed as

morbidityproton therapyradiation therapyrenal pelvis cancersurvivalureter cancer

Identifiers

PMID31289673
PMCPMC6547882
OpenAlexW2945214355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.