ReviewMolecular and clinical oncology2019
Global serum metabolomics profiling of colorectal cancer.
Review in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- The causal relationship between serum metabolites and the development of infertility: A Mendelian randomization analysis.Medicine · 2026Article
- Temporal Immune and Metabolic Shifts Drive the Anti-Tumor Efficacy of Resiquimod-Loaded Nanoparticles in Peritoneal Carcinomatosis.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Antitumor Activity of the Ethanolic Extract fromPharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Crosstalk between dysregulated amino acid sensing and glucose and lipid metabolism in colorectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Reduced murine double minute-2 methylation from peripheral blood mononuclear cells correlates with enhanced oxidative stress in hepatitis b virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Plasma metabolite profiles related to dietary patterns: exploring the association with colorectal tumor risk.European journal of nutrition · 2024Article
- Increase in GPIHBP1 expression in advanced stage colorectal cancer indicates poor immune surveillance.Translational cancer research · 2024Article
- Colorectal Cancer Detection via Metabolites and Machine Learning.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Article
- Untargeted metabolomics in gastric and colorectal cancer patients - preliminary results.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024Article
- Current status of serum metabolites biomarkers for polyps and colorectal cancer: a systematic review.Gastroenterology report · 2024Review
- Metabolomics analyses of cancer tissue from patients with colorectal cancer.Molecular medicine reports · 2023Article
- Clinical efficacy and metabolomic analysis of ozone major autohemotherapy for the treatment of herpes zoster.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2023Article
- Metabolite Alterations in Autoimmune Diseases: A Systematic Review of Metabolomics Studies.Metabolites · 2023Review
- New Insights into the Identification of Metabolites and Cytokines Predictive of Outcome for Patients with Severe SARS-CoV-2 Infection Showed Similarity with Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- A Novel Approach on the Use of Samples from Faecal Occult Blood Screening Kits for Metabolomics Analysis: Application in Colorectal Cancer Population.Metabolites · 2023Article
- Epstein-Barr Virus-Encoded MicroRNA-BART18-3p Promotes Colorectal Cancer Progression by Targeting De Novo Lipogenesis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Article
- A Comprehensive Mass Spectrometry-Based Workflow for Clinical Metabolomics Cohort Studies.Metabolites · 2022Article
- Detecting Colorectal Adenomas and Cancer Using Volatile Organic Compounds in Exhaled Breath: A Proof-of-Principle Study to Improve Screening.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Article
- The Application of Metabolomics in Recent Colorectal Cancer Studies: A State-of-the-Art Review.Cancers · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) relies on the use of invasive tools such as colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy. Non-invasive tools are less sensitive in detecting the disease, particularly in the early stage. A number of researchers have used metabolomics analyses on serum/plasma samples of patients with CRC compared with normal healthy individuals in an effort to identify biomarkers for CRC. The aim of the present review is to compare reported serum metabolomics profiles of CRC and to identify common metabolites affected among these studies. A literature search was performed to include any experimental studies on global metabolomics profile of CRC using serum/plasma samples published up to March 2018. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) tool was used to assess the quality of the studies reviewed. In total, nine studies were included. The studies used various analytical platforms and were performed on different populations. A pathway enrichment analysis was performed using the data from all the studies under review. The most affected pathways identified were protein biosynthesis, urea cycle, ammonia recycling, alanine metabolism, glutathione metabolism and citric acid cycle. The metabolomics analysis revealed levels of metabolites of glycolysis, tricarboxylic acid cycle, anaerobic respiration, protein, lipid and glutathione metabolism were significantly different between cancer and control samples. Although the majority of differentiating metabolites identified were different in the different studies, there were several metabolites that were common. These metabolites include pyruvic acid, glucose, lactic acid, malic acid, fumaric acid, 3-hydroxybutyric acid, tryptophan, phenylalanine, tyrosine, creatinine and ornithine. The consistent dysregulation of these metabolites among the different studies suggest the possibility of common diagnostic biomarkers for CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.