Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31289653›Full record

ArticleFood science & nutrition2019

Optimization of deacidification for concentrated grape juice.

Ning Li, Yue Wei, Xuemeng Li, Jiahui Wang, Jiaqian Zhou, Jie Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science & nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ning LiCollege of Food Science and Technology Agricultural University of Hebei Baoding China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8820-3301
Yue WeiCollege of Science and Technology Agricultural University of Hebei Huanghua China.
Xuemeng LiCollege of Science and Technology Agricultural University of Hebei Huanghua China.
Jiahui WangCollege of Science and Technology Agricultural University of Hebei Huanghua China.
Jiaqian ZhouCollege of Science and Technology Agricultural University of Hebei Huanghua China.
Jie WangCollege of Food Science and Technology Agricultural University of Hebei Baoding China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Excessive organic acids in grape juice will not only result in poor taste but will also cause turbidity and sedimentation. Tartaric acid exerts the most significant acidity among all organic acids in grape juice. In this study, we used tartaric acid as the main target and anion-exchange resin to remove tartaric acid from concentrated grape juice. Factors influencing the removal process were optimized by liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection and statistical analysis for optimal deacidification of concentrated grape juice. Use of the anion-exchange resin 335 treat the concentrated grape juice at a ratio of 1:6 (2:11.98) at 15.57°C for 4.35 hr. The tartaric acid removal rate reached 69.01%; the anion-exchange resin 335 demonstrated the best removal effect.

Indexed as

anion‐exchange resinconcentrated grape juiceoptimized deacidificationtartaric acid

Identifiers

PMID31289653
PMCPMC6593384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.